Designing mark-recapture studies to reduce effects of distance weighting on movement distance distributions of stream fishes

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 132, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 925-939

  Albanese, Brett ^a,c   Angermeier, Paul L ^a   Gowan, Charles ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RANDOLPH MACON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Georgia Natural Heritage Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FISH; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MOVEMENT; STREAM;

LEUCISCUS CEPHALUS; NOCOMIS; NOCOMIS LEPTOCEPHALUS; PISCES; THALASSOMA BIFASCIATUM;

EID: 0141564892     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T03-019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albanese, B. 2001. Movement of fishes in a network of streams and implications for persistence. Doctoral dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg.
2. Angermeier, P. L., K. L. Krueger, and C. A. Dolloff, 2002. Discontinuity of stream-fish distributions: implications for assessing and predicting species occurrence. Pages 519-529 in J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, and M. L. Morrison, editors. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Covelo, California.
3. Aparicio, E., and A. de Sostoa. 1999. Pattern of movements of adult Barbus haasi in a small Mediterranean stream. Journal of Fish Biology 55:1086-1095.
4. Baker, M., N. Nur, and G. R. Geupel. 1995. Correcting biased estimates of dispersal and survival due to limited study area: theory and application using wren tits. Condor 97:663-674.
5. Barrowclough, G. F. 1978. Sampling bias in dispersal studies based on finite area. Bird-Banding 49:333-341.
6. Cytel Software. 2002. StatXact 5 user manual, volumes 1 and 2. Cytel Software, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Dunham, J. B., and B. E. Reiman. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications 9:642-655.
8. Ensign, W. E., K. N. Leftwich, P. L. Angermeier, and C. A. Dolloff. 1997. Factors influencing stream fish recovery following a large-scale disturbance. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:895-907.
9. Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgersen, C. V. Baxter, and H. W. Li. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52:483-498.
10. Freeman, M. C. 1995. Movement by two small fishes in a large stream. Copeia 1995:361-367.
11. Gerking, S. D. 1959. The restricted movement of fish populations. Biological Reviews 34:221-242.
12. Goforth, R. R., and J. W. Foltz. 1998. Movements of the yellowfin shiner, Notropis lutipinnis. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 7:49-55.
13. Gowan, C., and K. D. Fausch. 1996. Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: reevaluating the concept of restricted movement. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:1370-1381.
14. Gowan, C., and K. D. Fausch. 2002. Why do foraging stream salmonids move during summer? Environmental Biology of Fishes 64:139-153.
15. Gowan, C., M. K. Young, K. D. Fausch, and S. C. Riley. 1994. Restricted movement in resident stream salmonids: a paradigm lost? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:2626-2637.
16. Hall, C. A. S. 1972. Migration and metabolism in a temperate stream ecosystem. Ecology 53:585-604.
17. Hill, J. H., and G. D. Grossman. 1987. Home range estimates for three North American stream fishes. Copeia 1987:376-380.
18. Hughes, N. F. 1998. Use of whole-stream patterns of age segregation to infer the interannual movements of stream salmonids: a demonstration with Arctic grayling in an interior Alaskan stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:1067-1071.
19. Koenig, W. D., D. Van Vuren, and P. N. Hooge. 1996. Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:514-517.
20. Kot, M., M. A. Lewis, and P. Van Den Driessche. 1996. Dispersal and the speed of invading organisms. Ecology 77:2027-2042.
21. Labbe, T. R., and K. D. Fausch. 2000. Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecological Applications 10:1774-1791.
22. Matheny, M. P., IV, and C. F. Rabeni. 1995. Patterns of movement and habitat use by northern hogsuckers in an Ozark stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:886-897.
23. Matthysen, E., F. Adriaensen, and A. A. Dhondt. 1995. Dispersal distances of nuthatches, Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented forest habitat. Oikos 72:375-381.
24. Mundahl, N. D., and C. G. Ingersoll. 1989. Home range, movements, and density of the central stoneroller, Campostoma anomalum, in a small Ohio stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 24:307-311.
25. Porter, J. H., and J. L. Dooley, Jr. 1993. Animal dispersal patterns: a reassessment of simple mathematical models. Ecology 74:2436-2443.
26. Rodriguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is incomplete, not lost. Ecology 83:1-13.
27. Schlosser, I. J., and P. L. Angermeier. 1995. Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. Pages 392-401 in J. L. Nielsen, editor. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 17, Bethesda, Maryland.
28. Scott, M. C., and G. S. Helfman. 2001. Native invasions, homogenization, and the mismeasure of integrity of fish assemblages. Fisheries 26(11):6-15.
29. Skalski, G. T., and J. F. Gilliam. 2000. Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81:1685-1700.
30. Smithson, E. B., and C. E. Johnston. 1999. Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita Highlands stream: an examination of the restricted movement paradigm. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:847-853.
31. Stenseth, N. C., and W. Z. Lidicker. 1992. Where do we stand methodologically about experimental design and methods of analysis in the study of dispersal? Pages 295-318 in N. C. Stenseth and W. Z. Lidicker, editors. Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. Chapman and Hall, London.
32. Stott, B. 1967. The movements and population densities of roach (Rutilus rutilus [L.]) and gudgeon (Gobio gobio [L.]) in the River Mole. Journal of Animal Ecology 36:407-423.
33. Van Deventer, J. S., and W. S. Platts. 1985. A computer software program for entering, managing, and analyzing fish capture data from streams. U.S. Forest Service Research Note INT-352.