Pain assessment after original transperineal prostate biopsy using a coaxial needle

Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 689-692

  Novella, Giovanni ^a   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a,b   Galfano, Antonio ^a   Ballario, Riccardo ^a   Novara, Giacomo ^a   Cavalleri, Stefano ^a   Artibani, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b OSPEDALE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COAXIAL NEEDLE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0141560765     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00483-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Emiliozzi P., Longhi P., Scarpone A., et al. The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 166:2001;845-850.
2. Buchberger W., Niehoff A., Obrist P., et al. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast technique, accuracy and indications . Radiologe. 42:2002;25-32.
3. Gupta S., Ahrar K., Morello F.A., et al. Masses in or around the pancreatic head CT-guided coaxial fine-needle aspiration biopsy with a posterior transcaval approach . Radiology. 222:2002;63-69.
4. Hopper K.D., Grenko R.T., TenHave T.R., et al. Percutaneous biopsy of the liver and kidney by using coaxial technique adequacy of the specimen obtained with three different needles in vitro . AJR Am J Roentgenol. 164:1995;221-224.
5. Jensen P.M., Karoly P., Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity a comparison of six methods . Pain. 27:1986;117-126.
6. Schostak M., Christoph F., Muller M., et al. Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate. Urology. 60:2002;253-257.
7. Shinohara K., Gulati M., Koppie T.M., et al. Transperineal prostate biopsy after abdominoperineal resection. J Urol. 169:2003;141-144.
8. Seymour H., Perry M.J.A., Lee-Elliot C., et al. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy the advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia . BJU Int. 88:2001;540-544.
9. Leibovici D., Zisman A., Siegel Y.I., et al. Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection a double-blind placebo controlled study . J Urol. 167:2001;563-565.
10. Taverna G., Maffezzini M., Benetti A., et al. A single injection of lidocaine as local anesthesia for ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol. 167:2002;222-223.
11. Costello T.G., Costello A.J. Anaesthesia for laser prostatectomy. Anesth Intensive Care. 22:1994;454-457.
12. Nash P.A., Bruce J.E., Indudhara R., et al. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol. 155:1996;607-609.
13. Soloway M.S., Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 163:2000;172-173.
14. Milani C., Dal Moro F., Battanello W., et al. Ultrasound-guide prostatic biopsy by perineal approach. Urologia. 67:2000;136-138.
15. Stirling B.N., Shockley K.F., Carothers G.G., et al. Comparison of local anesthesia techniques during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies. Urology. 60:2002;89-92.