Value efficiency analysis of academic research

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 121-132

  Korhonen, Pekka ^a   Tainio, Risto ^a   Wallenius, Jyrki ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Academic research; Data envelopment analysis; Education; Multicriteria analysis; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141557704     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00050-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agrell, P., Steuer, R., 1997. Faculty performance measurement using data envelopment analysis. Working Paper WP-246, Department of Production Economics, Linköping Institute of Technology, Sweden.
2. Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R.G., Thanassoulis, E., 1997. Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions. Annals of Operations Research 73, 13-34.
3. Arnold, V., Bardhan, I., Cooper, W.W., Gallegos, A., 1998. Primal and dual optimality in computer codes using two-stage solution procedures in DEA. In: Aronson, J., Zionts, S. (Eds.). Operations Research: Models, Methods and Applications (A volume in honor of G.L. Thompson.). Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
4. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data development analysis. Management Science 30, 1078-1092.
5. Bogetoft, P., 1997. DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation. Annals of Operations Research 73, 277-298.
6. Bogetoft, P., 2000. DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 7-48.
7. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., Trevett, G., 1991. The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Jessica Kingsley, London.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
9. Fandel, G., Gal, T., 1997. Umvertailung der Mittel fur Lehre und Forschung unter den Universitäten. Diskussionsbeitrag 248, FB Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Fernuniversität Hagen, D-58054 Hagen, Deutschland.
10. Golany, B., 1988. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 39, 725-734.
11. Halme, M., Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Salo, S., Wallenius, J., 1999. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data evelopment analysis. Management Science 45, 103-115.
12. Jennergren, L. Peter, Børge Obel, 1985. If there is something rotten in the state of Denmark, we will find it with data development analysis, research efficiency of business administration and economics university departments. Department of Business Administration Reports 85, no. 7, Odense University.
13. Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., 1988. A Pareto Race. Naval Research Logistics 35, 615-623.
14. Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., 1990. Using qualitative data in multiple objective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research 48, 81-87.
15. Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., 1989. A careful look at efficiency and utility in multiple criteria decision making: A tutorial. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 6, 46-62.
16. Lootsma, F., Bots, P., 1997. The assignment of scores for output-based research funding. Delft University of Technology, unpublished.
17. Moed, H.F., Burger, W., Frankfort, J., Van Raan, A., 1985. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university performance. Research Policy 14, 131-149.
18. Önel, A., Saatcioglu, Ö., 1995. Trend analysis and regression modelling for the assessment of research performance at a Turkish university. Transactions on Operational Research 7, 1-12.
19. Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Salinas-Jimenez, J., Smith, P., 1997. On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 215-230.
20. Quality Assessment of Research, Economics. Association of the Universities in the Netherlands, Leidseveer 35, P.O. Box 19270, 3501 DG Utrecht, December 1995.
21. Quality Assessment of Research, Mathematics and Computer Science. Association of the Universities in the Netherlands, Leidseveer 35, P.O. Box 19270, 3501 DG Utrecht, September 1997.
22. Saaty, T., 1980. The Analytic Hierachy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.
23. Thanassoulis, E., Dyson, R.G., 1992. Estimating preferred target input-output levels using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 56, 80-97.
24. Thanassoulis, E., Allen, R., 1998. Simulating weights restrictions in envelopment analysis. Management Science 44, 586-594.
25. Thrall, R.M., 1996. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Annals of Operations Research 66, 109-138.
26. Wallmark, J.T., Sedig, K.G., 1986. Quality of research measured by citation method and by peer review - a comparison. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 33, 218-222.
27. Wallmark, J.T., McQueen, D.H., Sedig, K.G., 1988. Measurement of output from university research. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35, 175-180.