Media content labeling systems: Informational advisories or judgmental restrictions?

The V-chip Debate: Content Filtering From Television To the Internet

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 157-178

  Roberts, Donald F ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141549133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Brehm, J. W. (1972). Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
2. Bushman, B. J., & Stack, A. D. (1996). Forbidden fruit versus tainted fruit: Effects of warning labels on attraction to television violence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 202-36
3. Cantor, J. & Harrison, K. (1996). Ratings and advisories for television programming. In National television violence study, 1995-1996: Scientific papers (pp. IIU-III.50). Studio City, CA: Mediascope
4. Cantor, J., Harrison, K., & Nathanson, A. (1997). Ratings and advisories for television programming: University of Wisconsin study. In National television violence study 2 (pp. 267-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
5. Christenson, P. G. (1992). The effects of parental advisory labels on adolescent music preferences. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 106-13
6. Christenson, P.G. (1997, May). The effect of video game ratings: Is there a boomerang effect? Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada
7. Comstock, George, with Paik, Haejung (1991). Television and the American child. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
8. Federman, Joel (1996). Media ratings: Design, use and consequences. Studio City, CA: Mediascope
9. Gerbner, G., & Signorelli, N. (1990). Violence profile, 1967 through 1988-89: Enduring patterns. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of Communications
10. Hechinger, F. M. (1992, April). Fateful choices: Healthy youth for the 21St. centuryExecutive summary. New York: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, Carnegie Corporation of New York
11. Huston, A. c., Donnerstein, E., Fairchild, H., Feshbach, N. D., Katz, P. A., Murray, J. P., Rubinstein, E.A., Wilcox, B.L., & Zuckerman, D. (1992). Big world, small screen: The role of television in American society. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press
12. Morkes, J., Chen, H. L., & Roberts, D. F. (1997, May). Adolescents' responses to movie, television and computer game ratings and advisories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada
13. National Institute of Mental Health (1982). Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties, Vol. I, Summary report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
14. National Television Violence Study (1996). Studio City, CA: Mediascope. Executive Summary: 1994-95 Scientific Papers: 1994-1995 Content Analysis Codebooks: 1994-1995
15. National Television Violence Study, Volume 2: Executive Summary. (1997). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California at Santa Barbara
16. Paik, H., & Comstock, G. (1994). The effects of television violence in antisocial behavior. Communication Research, 21, 516-46
17. Roberts, D. F. (1993). Adolescents and the mass media: From "Leave it to Beaver" to "Beverly Hills 90210." Teachers College Record, 94, 629-43
18. Roberts, D. F. (1997, in press). From Plato's republic to Hillary's village: Children and the changing media environment. In R.P. Weissberg, C.B. Kuster, O. Reyes, & H.J. Walberg (Eds). Trends in the well-being of children and youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
19. Sex and violence in popular culture (1995). New York Times, July 23-26, p. 6
20. Starker, Steven (1989). Evil influences: Crusades against the mass media. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers
21. Wilson, Barbara J., Donnerstein, Ed, Linz, Dan, Kunkel, Dale, Potter, James, Smith, Stacy L., Blumenthal, Eva, & Gray, Tim (1996). Content analysis of entertainment television: The importance of context. Paper presented to the Duke University Conference on Media Violence and Public Policy, June 28-29, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina
22. Wilson, B. J., Kunkel, D., Linz, D., Potter, J., Donnerstein, E., Smith, S., Blumenthal, E., & Gray, T. (1996). Television violence and its context: University of California, Santa Barbara study. National Television Violence Study, Scientific Papers (pp. 5-268). Studio City, CA: Mediascope