A note on the correspondence among entail relations, rough set dependencies, and logical consequence

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 393-401

  Düntsch, Ivo ^a   Gediga, Günther ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141549029     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1316     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Birkhoff G. Lattice theory. 1948;Am. Math. Soc. Providence.
2. Davey B. A., Priestley H. A. Introduction to lattices and order. 1990;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
3. Doignon J. P., Falmagne J. C. Knowledge spaces. 1999;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. Düntsch I., Gediga G. On query procedures to build knowledge structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 40:1996;160-168.
5. Düntsch I., Gediga G. Algebraic aspects of attribute dependencies in information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae. 29:1997a;119-133.
6. Düntsch I., Gediga G. Statistical evaluation of rough set dependency analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 46:1997b;589-604.
7. Düntsch I., Gediga G. Knowledge structures and their applications in CALL systems. Jager S., Nerbonne J., van Essen A. Language teaching and language technology. 1998;177-186 Swets en Zeitlinger, Lisse.
8. Düntsch I., Gediga G. Rough set data analysis. Encyclopedia of computer science and technology. 2000;Dekker, New York.
9. Falmagne J.-C., Koppen M., Villano M., Doignon J.-P., Johannesen J. Introduction to knowledge spaces: How to build, test and search them. Psychological Review. 97:1990;202-234.
10. Farris J. S. An efficient method for finding monothetic groups. Systematic Zoology. 27:1978;468-472.
11. Gabbay D. M. Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems. Apt K. R. Logics and models of concurrent systems. Nato Advanced Studies Institute. F13:1985;439-457 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. Ganter B., Wille R. Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. 1999;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. Grätzer G. General lattice theory. 1978;Birkhäuser, Basel.
14. Koppen M., Doignon J.-P. How to build a knowledge space by querying an expert. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 34:1990;311-331.
15. Novotný J., Novotný M. Notes on the algebraic approach to dependence in information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae. 16:1992;263-273.
16. Novotný J., Novotný M. On dependence in Wille's contexts. Fundamenta Informaticae. 19:1993;343-353.
17. Novotný M. Dependence spaces of information systems. Orlowska E. Incomplete information - Rough set analysis. 1997;193-246 Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
18. Orlowska E. Incomplete information - Rough set analysis. 1997;Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
19. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science. 11:1982;341-356.
20. Pawlak Z., Rauszer C. Dependency of attributes in information systems. Bulletin Polish Academy of Science and Mathematics. 9-10:1985;551-559.
21. Rusch A., Wille R. Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis. Bock H.-H., Polasek W. Data analysis and information systems. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. 1996;427-436 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Sharrock G., Felsenstein J. Finding all monothetic subsets of a taxonomic group. Systematic Zoology. 24:1975;373-377.
23. Tarski A. Fundamentale Begriffe der Methodologie der deduktiven Wissenschaften. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik. 37:1930;361-404.
24. Wille R. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. Rival I. Ordered sets. NATO Advanced Studies Institute. 83:1982;445-470 Reidel, Dordrecht.