How many boolean algebras P(ℕ)/I are there?

Illinois Journal of Mathematics

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 999-1035

  Farah, Ilijas ^a,b,c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141543842     PISSN: 00192082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1258138463     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. C.C. Chang and H.J. Keisler, Model theory, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1973.
2. E.K. van Douwen, The automorphism group of P(ω)/Fin need not be simple, Topology Appl. 34 (1990), 97-104.
3. E.K. van Douwen and J. van Mill, Parovičenko's characterization of βω - ω implies CH, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1978), 539-541.
4. A. Dow and K.P. Hart, Applications of another characterization of βℕ\ℕ, Topology Appl. 122 (2002), 105-133.
5. I. Farah, Completely additive liftings, Bull. Symbolic Logic 4 (1998), 37-54.
6. _, Analytic quotients: theory of liftings for quotients over analytic ideals on the integers, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2000).
7. _, Luzin gaps, preprint, 2001; available at http://www.math.yorku.ca/∼ifarah.
8. _, Rigidity conjectures, Proceedings of Logic Colloquium 2000, to appear; available at http://www.math.yorku.ca/∼ifarah.
9. σδ ideals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 1971-1975.
10. D.H. Fremlin, Notes on farah P99, preprint, University of Essex, June 1999.
11. W. Just and A. Krawczyk, On certain Boolean algebras P(ω)/I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 285 (1984), 411-429.
12. W. Just and Ž. Mijajlović, Separation properties of ideals over ω, Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 33 (1987), 267-276.
13. V. Kanovei and M. Reeken, On Ulam's problem concerning the stability of approximate homomorphisms, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 231 (2000), 249-283 (Russian); English translation: Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 2000, no. 4 (231), 238-270.
14. V. Kanovei and M. Reeken, On Ulam's problem concerning the stability of approximate homomorphisms, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 231 (2000), 249-283 (Russian); English translation: Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 2000, no. 4 (231), 238-270.
15. _, New Radon- Nikodym ideals, Mathematika 47 (2002), 219-227.
16. S. Koppelberg, Homogeneous Boolean algebras may have non-simple automorphism groups, Topology Appl. 21 (1985), 103-120.
17. A. Louveau and B. Velickovic, A note on Borel equivalence relations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1994), 255-259.
18. A.R.D. Mathias, A remark on rare filters, Infinite and finite sets (Colloq., Keszthely, 1973), vol. III, Coll. Math. Soc, Janos Bolyai, vol. 10, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 1095-1097.
19. 1*-gaps in the Boolean algebra P(ω)/I, Fund. Math. 138 (1991), 103-111.
20. J.D. Monk and R.M. Solovay, On the number of complete Boolean algebras, Algebra Universal 2 (1972), 365-368.
21. M.R. Oliver, Uncountably many algebras of the form P(ω)/I, I Borel, preprint, UCLA, 2002.
22. W. Rudin, Homogeneity problems in the theory of Čech compactifications, Duke Math. J. 23 (1956), 409-419.
23. S. Shelah, Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.
24. S. Shelah and J. Steprans, Non-trivial homeomorphisms of βℕ\ℕ without the continuum hypothesis, Fund. Math. 132 (1989), 135-141.
25. S. Solecki, Analytic ideals and their applications, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 99 (1999), 51-72.
26. J. Steprans, Many quotient algebras of the integers by the Borel ideals, preprint, York University, 2002.
27. _, email message, June 10, 2002.
28. S. Todorcevic, Gaps in analytic quotients, Fund, Math. 156 (1998), 85-97.
29. B. Velickovic, Definable automorphisms of P(ω)/ Fin, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 96 (1986), 130-135.
30. P. Štěpánek and M. Rubin, Homogeneous Boolean algebras, Handbook of Boolean algebras (D. Monk and R. Bonnett, eds.), vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 679-715.
31. 2-absoluteness, handwritten note, May 1985.
32. S. Zafrany, Borel ideals vs. Borel sets of countable relations and trees, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 43 (1989), 161-195.