Refractive state of tree shrew eyes measured with cortical visual evoked potentials

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 80, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 623-631

  Norton, Thomas T ^a   Wu, Wende W ^a   Siegwart Jr , John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal models; Hyperopia; Refractive error; Retinoscopy; Tupidae

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; LIGHT REFRACTION; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES; REFRACTOMETERS;

RETINOSCOPY;

VISION;

ATROPINE; PHENYLEPHRINE;

ACCOMMODATION PARALYSIS; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; INSECTIVORE; LENS; MEASUREMENT; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINOSCOPY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; LENSES; MYOPIA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETINOSCOPY; TUPAIIDAE; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0141543754     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200309000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Hyman L, Hussein M, Norton TT. Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:314-21.
2. Glickstein M, Millodot M. Retinoscopy and eye size. Science 1970;168:605-6.
3. Norton TT, McBrien NA. Normal development of refractive state and ocular component dimensions in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Vision Res 1992;32:833-42.
4. Norton TT. Animal models of myopia: learning how vision controls the size of the eye. ILAR J 1999;40:59-77.
5. Marsh-Tootle WL, Norton TT. Refractive and structural measures of lid-suture myopia in tree shrew. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:2245-57.
6. Norton TT, Rada JA. Reduced extracellular matrix in mammalian sclera with induced myopia. Vision Res 1995;35:1271-81.
7. Shaikh AW, Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. Effect of interrupted lens wear on compensation for a minus lens in tree shrews. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:308-15.
8. Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. Regulation of the mechanical properties of tree shrew sclera by the visual environment. Vision Res 1999;39:387-407.
9. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr, German AJ, Robertson J, Wu WW. Comparison of cycloplegic streak retinoscopy with autorefractor measures in tree shrew eyes with, and without, induced myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:S563.
10. Harter MR, White CT. Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visually evoked cortical potentials. Vision Res 1968;8:701-11.
11. Millodot M, Riggs LA. Refraction determined electrophysiologically: responses to alternation of visual contours. Arch Ophthalmol 1970;84:272-8.
12. Sokol S. Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 1978;18:33-9.
13. Sokol S, Jones K, Nadler D. Comparison of the spatial response properties of the human retina and cortex as measured by simultaneously recorded pattern ERG's and VEP's. Vision Res 1983;23:723-7.
14. Elliott DB. Supplementary clinical tests of visual function. In: Zadnik K, ed. The Ocular Examination: Measurements and Findings. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997:303-38.
15. Berkley MA, Watkins DW. Grating resolution and refraction in the cat estimated from evoked cerebral potentials. Vision Res 1973;13:403-15.
16. Mutti DO, Ver Hoeve JN, Zadnik K, Murphy CJ. The artifact of retinoscopy revisited: comparison of refractive error measured by retinoscopy and visual evoked potential in the rat. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:483-8.
17. Norton TT, Wu WW, Siegwart JT Jr. Refractive state measured with visual evoked potentials, streak retinoscopy and an autorefractor in tree shrew eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S58.
18. Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. Goggles for controlling the visual environment of small animals. Lab Anim Sci 1994;44:292-4.
19. Kaas JH, Hall WC, Killackey H, Diamond IT. Visual cortex of the tree shrew (Tupaia glis): architectonic subdivisions and representations of the visual field. Brain Res 1972;42:491-6.
20. Casagrande VA, Condo GJ. The effect of altered neuronal activity on the development of layers in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci 1988;8:395-416.
21. DeBruyn EJ, Casagrande VA. Morphological differences in retinal ganglion cells projecting to different layers of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the tree shrew. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1983;9:809.
22. Petry HM, Fox R, Casagrande VA. Spatial contrast sensitivity of the tree shrew. Vision Res 1984;24:1037-42.
23. Green DG, Powers MK, Banks MS. Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity. Vision Res 1980;20:827-35.
24. Hueter RE, Murphy CJ, Howland M, Sivak JG, Paul-Murphy JR, Howland HC. Refractive state and accommodation in the eyes of free-swimming versus restrained juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris). Vision Res 2001;41:1885-9.
25. Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. When viewing distance is controlled, which lens power competes most effectively to slow myopic compensation to a -5 D lens? 2002 Annual Meeting Abstract and Program Planner. Abstract 185 Available at: www.arvo.org. Accessed June 9, 2003.
26. Humphrey AL, Albano JE, Norton TT. Organization of ocular dominance in tree shrew striate cortex. Brain Res 1977;134:225-36.
27. McBrien NA, Norton, TT. The development of experimental myopia and ocular component dimensions in monocularly lid-sutured tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Vision Res 1992;32:843-52.
28. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr. Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. J Am Optom Assoc 1995;66:405-14.
29. Ramamirtham R, Norton TT, Siegwart JT, Roorda A. Wave aberrations of tree shtew eyes. 2003 Annual Meeting Abstract and Program Planner. Abstract 1986. Available at: www.arvo.org. Accessed June 9, 2003.
30. Ramamirtham R, Kee CS, Hung LF, Ying Q, Harwerth R, Smith E III. Comparison of objective and subjective refractions in Macaca mulatta. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(Suppl):90.
31. Hughes A. The refractive state of the rat eye. Vision Res 1977;17:927-39.
32. Walls GL. The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation. Bloomfield Hills, MI: The Cranbrook Institute of Science, 1942.
33. Mariani AP. Multiaxonal horizontal cells in the retina of the tree shrew, Tupaia glis. J Comp Neurol 1985;233:553-63.
34. Muller B, Peichl L. Topography of cones and rods in the tree shrew retina. J Comp Neurol 1989;282:581-94.