Bow shock motions observed with CLUSTER

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2003, Pages

  Maksimovic, M ^a   Bale, S D ^b   Horbury, T S ^c   Andre M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF SPACE PHYSICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLASMAS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT; WIND; EARTH SCIENCES; GEOPHYSICS;

SHOCK MOTIONS; BOW SHOCKS; CLUSTER MISSION; SHOCK SPEED; SOLAR WIND PLASMAS; SUBSOLAR POINTS; TIME DERIVATIVE; TIME FRAME; TIME INTERVAL;

GEOPHYSICS; PLASMA SHOCK WAVES;

SOLAR ACTIVITY;

EID: 0141539207     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002GL016761     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Balogh, A., et al., The Cluster Magnetic Field Investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 79, 65-92, 1997.
2. Cairns, I. H., et al., Unusual locations of the Earth's bow shock on September 24-25, 1987: Mach number effects, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 47, 1995.
3. Fairfield, D. H., Average and unusual locations of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6700, 1971.
4. Fairfield, D. H., I. H. Cairns, M. D. Desch, A. Szabo, A. J. Lazarus, and M. R. Aellig, The location of low Mach number bow shocks at Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 25,361-25,376, 2001.
5. Farris, M. H., and C. T. Russell, Determining the standoff distance of the bow shock: Mach number dependence and use of models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 17,681, 1994.
6. Filbert, P. C., and P. J. Kellogg, Electrostatic noise at the plasma frequency upstream of Earth's bow shock, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1369, 1979.
7. Formisano, V., Orientation and shape of the Earth's bow shock in three dimensions, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 1151, 1979.
8. Gustafsson, G., et al., The Electric Field and Wave Experiment for the Mission, Space Sci. Rev, 79, 137-156, 1997.
9. Horbury, T. S., et al., Four spacecraft measurements of the quasiperpendicular terrestrial bow shock: Orientation and motion, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2001JA000273, 2002.
10. Marsch, E., K. H. Muhlhauser, H. Rosenbauer, R. Schwenn, and F. M. Neubauer, Solar-Wind Helium-ions - observations of the Helios solar probes Between 0.3-au and 1-au, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 35-51, 1982.
11. Pedersen, A., P. Decreau, C.-P. Escoubet, G. Gustafsson, H. Laakso, P.-A. Lindqvist, B. Lybekk, A. Masson, F. Mozer, and A. Vaivads, Four-point high time resolution information on electron densities by the electric field experiments (EFW) on Cluster, Ann. Geophys., 19, 1483-1489, 2001.
12. Peredo, M., J. A. Slavin, E. Mazur, and S. A. Curtis, Three-dimensional position and shape of the bow shock and their variations with Alvnic, sonic and magnetosonic Mach numbers and interplanetary magnetic field orientation, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 7907-7916, 1995.
13. Sibeck, D. J., R. E. Lopez, and E. C. Roelof, Solar Wind flow control of the magnetopause shape, location, and motion, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5489-5495, 1991.
14. Slavin, J. A., and R. E. Holzer, Solar Wind flow about the terrestrial planets, 1, Modeling bow shock position and shape, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11,401, 1981.
15. Spreiter, J. R., A. L. Summers, and A. Y. Alksne, Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere. Planet. Space Sci., 14, 223-253, 1966.
16. Völk, H. J., and R.-D. Auer, Motions of the Bow Shock Induced by Interplanetary Disturbances, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 40-48, 1974.