Reproducibility of nasal function measurements with histamine and adenosine monophosphate nasal challenge testing in patients with allergic rhinitis

Allergology International

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 155-160

  Wilson, Andrew M ^a   Orr, Linda C ^a   Robb, Fiona ^a   Sims, Erika J ^a   Lipworth, Brian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adenosine monophosphate; Allergic rhinitis; Histamine; Nasal challenge; Nasal inspiratory flow

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE MONOPHOSPHATE DEAMINASE; HISTAMINE;

ADULT; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MALE; MEDIATOR RELEASE; NOSE PROVOCATION TEST; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; PERENNIAL RHINITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHINOMANOMETRY; RHINOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYMPTOM;

EID: 0141538314     PISSN: 13238930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1592.2003.00294.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Malm L, Gerth VW, Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society. Rhinology 2000; 38: 1-6.
2. Milewski M, Mastalerz L, Nizankowska E, Szczeklik A. Nasal provocation test with lysine-aspirin for diagnosis of aspirin-sensitive asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1998; 101: 581-6.
3. Tomaz EM, Ferreira MF, Spinola MA, Oliveira ML, Clode MH, Palma C. Nasal provocation tests in the diagnosis of urticaria induced by acetylsalicylic acid. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1997; 18: 319-22.
4. Parvez L, Hilberg O, Vaidya M, Noronha A. Nasal histamine challenge: A reproducible model of induced congestion measured by acoustic rhinometry. Rhinol. Suppl. 2000; 16: 45-50.
5. Kanthawatana S, Maturim W, Fooanan S, Trakultivakorn M. Skin prick reaction and nasal provocation response in diagnosis of nasal allergy to the house dust mite. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997; 79: 427-30.
6. Bousquet J, van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001; 108: 147-334.
7. Polosa R, Pagano C, Prosperini G et al. Histamine release upon adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) nasal provocation in allergic subjects. Thorax 1999; 54: 230-3.
8. Wilson AM, Lipworth BJ. Dose-response evaluation of the therapeutic index for inhaled budesonide in mild to moderate atopic asthmatic patients. Am. J. Med. 2000; 108: 269-75.
9. Terrien MH, Rahm F, Fellrath JM, Spertini F. Comparison of the effects of terfenadine with fexofenadine on nasal provocation tests with allergen. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999; 103: 1025-30.
10. Plavec D, Somogyi-Zalud E, Godnic-Cvar J. Modified method of nonspecific nasal provocation with histamine for routine use. Ann. Allergy 1994; 72: 321-8.
11. Ferreira MB, Carlos AG. Anterior rhinomanometry in nasal allergen challenges. Allerg. Immunol. 1998; 30: 295-7.
12. Giannico R, Oliveira CA, Sole D, Naspitz CK. Nonspecific nasal provocation in children with chronic allergic rhinitis. J. Invest. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 1996; 6: 110-16.
13. Kanthawatana S, Maturim W, Fooanant S, Manorot M, Trakultivakorn M. Evaluation of threshold criteria for the nasal histamine challenge test in perennial allergic rhinitis. Asian Pacific J. Allergy Immunol. 1997; 15: 65-9.
14. Miyahara Y, Ukai K, Yamagiwa M, Ohkawa C, Sakakura Y. Nasal passage patency in patients with allergic rhinitis measured by acoustic rhinometry: Nasal responses after allergen and histamine provocation. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998; 25: 261-7.
15. Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai JP, Zamel N. The role of acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation testing. Ear Nose Throat J. 1975; 76: 747-50.
16. Pirila T, Nuutinen J. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal secretion in the clinical monitoring of the nasal provocation test. Clin. Exp. Allergy 1998; 28: 468-77.
17. Austin CE, Foreman JC. Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1994; 37: 33-7.
18. Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahm F, Terrien MH, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen. Allergy 1999; 54: 974-9.
19. Lund VJ. International consensus report on the diagnosis and management of rhinitis. International Rhinitis Management Working Group. Allergy 1994; 49: 1-34.
20. Naito K, Iwata S. Current advances in rhinomanometry. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 1997; 254: 309-12.
21. Wilson AM, Fowler SJ, Martin SW, White PS, Gardiner Q, Lipworth BJ. Evaluation of the importance of head and probe stabilisation in acoustic rhinometry. Rhinology 2001; 39: 93-7.
22. Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Robb F, Cockburn W, Lipworth BJ. Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge. Rhinology 2003; 41: 16-20.
23. Gleeson MJ, Youlten LJ, Shelton DM, Siodlak MZ, Eiser NM, Wengraf CL. Assessment of nasal airway patency: A comparison of four methods. Clin. Otolaryngol. 1986; 11: 99-107.