Fitting of a Closed Planar Curve Representing a Profile of an Archaeological Fragment

Proceedings VAST 2001 Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 263-269

  Hlavackova Schindler, Kateřina ^a   Kampel, Martin ^a   Sablatnig, Robert ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERPOLATION; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

ARCHAEOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION;

CERAMIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0141538268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/584993.585034     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. W.Y. Adams and E.W. Adams. Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality. A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting. Cambridge, 1991.
2. D.E. Arnold. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge, 1985.
3. L.R. Binford. Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Cultural Process. American Antiquity, 31:203-210, 1965.
4. T.J. Rivlin C.A.Micchelli and S. Winograd. The Optimal Recovery of Smooth Functions. Numerische Mathematik, 26:191-200, 1976.
5. A. Carandini. Atlante delle forme ceramiche II, forma toynbee 1957. page 142, 1985.
6. W. Czysz and W. Endres. Archäologie und Geschichte der Keramik in Schwaben. Neusädf, 1991.
7. R. DeVore and G. Lorentz. Constructive Approximation. Springer, 1993.
8. W. Erdmann, H.J. Kühn, and H. Lüdtke. Rahmenterminologie zur mittelalterlichen Keramik. pages 417-436, 1984.
9. E. Ettlinger, P.M. Kenrick, K. Roth-Rubi, and S. Zabehlicky-Scheffenegger. Conspectus formarum terrae sigillatae italico modo confectae. Bonn, 1990.
10. J.C. Gardin. Code pour l'analyse des ornaments. Paris, 1978.
11. J.C. Gardin. Code pour l'analyse des formes de poteries. Paris, 1985.
12. V. Gassner. Zur Entstehung des Typus der ionisch- massiliotischen Amphoren. In Fremde Zeiten. Festschrift fr̈ Jürgen Borchhardt, pages 165-176. Wien, 1996.
13. I. Gathmann. ARCOS, ein Gerät zur automatischen bildhaften Erfassung der Form von Keramik. FhG - Berichte, (2):30-33, 1984.
14. A. Guénoche and A. Tchernia. Essai de construction d'un modèle descriptif des amphores. In Méthodes classiques et méthodes formelles dans l'étude del Amphores (Actes du colloque, de Rome 27-29 Mai 1974), pages 247-259. École Francaise de Rome 32, 1977.
15. M.B. Hagstrum and J.A. Hildebrand. The two-curve Method for Reconstructing Ceramic Morphology. American Antiquity, 55(2):388-403, 1990.
16. N.S. Hall and S. Laflin. A Computer Aided Design Technique for Pottery Profiles. In S. Laflin, editor, Computer Applications in Archaeology, pages 178-188. Computer Center, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1984.
17. E. Hamon and A. Hesnard. Problèmes de documentation et de description relatifs à un corpus d'amphores romaines. In Méthodes classiques et méthodes formelles dans l'étude des Amphores (Actes du colloque de Rome 27-29 Mai 1974), pages 17-33. École Francaise de Rome 32, 1977.
18. J. W. Hayes. Late Roman Pottery, London, page 61, 1972.
19. M. Kampel and R. Sablatnig. On 3d Modelling of Archaeological Sherds. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Synthetic-Natural Hybrid Coding and Three Dimensional Imaging, Santorini, Greece, pages 95-98, 1999.
20. M. Kampel and R. Sablatnig. Automated 3D Recording of Archaeological Pottery. In D. Bearman and F. Garzotto (Ed.). Proc. of the Int. Conf on Cultural Heritage and Technologies in the Third Millennium Milan, Italy, pages 169-182, 2001.
21. C. Liska and R. Sablatnig. Estimating the Next Sensor Position based on Surface Characteristics. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 538-541, September 2000.
22. A. Pinkus M. Leshno, V.Y. Lin and S. Schocken. Multilayered Feedforward Networks with a Nonpolynomial Activation Function can Approximate any Function. Neural Networks, 6:861-867, 1993.
23. M. Mackensen. Die spätantiken Sigillata- und Lampentöpfereien von El Mahrine (Nordtunesien), page 590, 1980.
24. P.L. Main. Accessing Outline Shape Information Efficiently within a large Database. In S. Laflin, editor, Computer Applications in Archaeology, pages 73-82. Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1986.
25. M. Millet. An Approach to the Functional Interpretation of Pottery. In Pottery and the Archaeologist, pages 35-48. London, 1979.
26. C. Orton, P. Tyers, and A. Vince. Pottery in Archaeology, 1993.
27. C.R. Orton. Mathematics in Archaeology. Cambridge, 1980.
28. P.M. Rice. Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook, 1987.
29. R. Sablatnig and C. Menard. Computer based Acquisition of Archaeological Finds: The First Step towards Automatic Classification. In P. Moscati/S. Mariotti, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Computing and Archaeology, Rome, volume 1, pages 429-446, 1996.
30. J.M. Schuring. Bulletin Antike Schaving. In Studies on Roman amphorae I-II, pages 59-137, 1995.
31. C.M. Sinopoli. Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. New York, 1991.
32. C. Steckner. Das SAMOS Projekt. Archäologie in Deutschland, (Heft 1): 16-21, 1989.
33. P. Waldhaeusl and K. Kraus. Photogrammetrie für die Archäologie. In Kandler M., editor, Lebendige Altertumswissenschaft: Festgabe zur Vollendung des 70. Lebensjahres von Hermann Vetters dargebracht von Freunden, Schülern und Kollegen, pages 423-427, Wien, 1985.