A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 67-73

  Heilpern, S ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Rank dependent utility theory; Zero utility principle

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141537174     PISSN: 01676687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6687(03)00144-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abdellaoui M. A genuine rank-dependent generalization of the von Neuman-Morgenstern expected utility theorem Econometrica 70 2002 717-736
2. Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique de postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine Econometrica 21 1953 503-546
3. Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., 2000. Choquet expected utility model: a new approach to individual behavior under uncertainty and to social welfare. In: Grabisch, M., Mirofushi, T., Sugeno, M. (Eds.), Fuzzy Measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
4. Chateauneuf A. Wakker P. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory for decision under risk Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18 1999 137-145
5. Chateauneuf A. Cohen M. Meilijson I. New tools to better model behavior under risk and uncertainty: an overview Finance 181 1997 25-46
6. Denneberg, D., 1994. Lectures on Non-additive Measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
7. Dhaene J. Denuit M. Goovaerts M.J. Kaas R. Vyncke D. The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 31 2002 3-33
8. Dhaene J. Denuit M. Goovaerts M.J. Kaas R. Vyncke D. The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 31 2002 133-161
9. Gerber, H.U., 1979. An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Homewood, Philadelphia.
10. Goovaerts, M.J., De Vylder, F.E., Haezendonck, J., 1984. Insurance Premiums: Theory and Applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
11. Green J.R. Jullien B. Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 1988 355-387
12. Heilpern S. Using Choquet integral in economics Statistical Papers 43 2002 53-74
13. Hürlimann W. On stop-loss order and distortion pricing principles ASTIN Bulletin 282 1998 119-134
14. Kahneman D. Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 45 1979 263-291
15. Luan C. Insurance premium calculations with anticipated utility theory ASTIN Bulletin 311 2001 27-39
16. Puppe, C., 1991. Distorted Probabilities and Choice Under Risk. Springer, Berlin.
17. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 1982 323-343
18. Segal U. Anticipated utility theory: a measure representation approach Annals of Operations Research 19 1989 359-373
19. von Neuman, J., Morgenstern, O., 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. Wakker P.P. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion Theory and Decision 36 1994 1-44
21. Wang S. Insurance pricing and increased limits ratemaking by proportional hazards transforms Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17 1995 43-54
22. Wang S. Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density ASTIN Bulletin 262 1996 71-92
23. Wang S. Dhaene J. Comonotonicity, correlation order and premium principles Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 22 1998 235-242
24. Yaari M.E. The dual theory of choice under risk Econometrica 55 1987 95-116