A computer-controlled administration of the matching familiar figures test

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 93-95

  Hummel Schluger, Andrew O ^a   Baer, John S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141531462     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03203642     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. GERDJE, P. E., BLOCK, J., & BLOCK, J. H. (1985). Longitudinal consistency of matching familiar figures test performance from early childhood to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 21, 262-271.
2. HECKEL, R. V., HIERS, J. M., LAVAL, C. J., & ALLEN, S. S. (1980). Adult norms on the Kagan Matching Familiar Figures Test of Impulsivity/ Reflectivity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 11, 5.
3. KAGAN, J., ROSMAN, B. L., DAY, D., ALBERT, J., & PHILLIPS, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78(1, Whole No. 578).
4. MESSER, S. B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026-1052.
5. MILICH, R., & KRAMER, J. (1984). Reflections on impulsivity: An empirical investigation of impulsivity as a construct. Advances in Learning & Behavioral Disabilities, 3, 57-94.
6. VAN MERRIËNBOER, J. J. G., & JELSMA, O. (1988). The Matching Familiar Figures Test: Computer or experimenter controlled administration? Educational & Psychological Measurement, 21, 181-186.
7. VAN MERRIENBOER, J. J. G., JELSMA, O., TIMMERMANS, J., & SIKKEN, J. (1989). Computerized vs. experimenter controlled administration of the Matching Familiar Figures Test: Mean test scores and reliabilities. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 49, 883-891.