Comparative genetic structure of the threatened tenebrionid beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its common relative Bolitophagus reticulatus

Journal of Insect Conservation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 111-124

  Jonsson, Mattias ^a   Johannesen, Jes ^b   Seitz, Alfred ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conservation; Gene flow; Genetic variability; Habitat fragmentation; Saproxylic beetles

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

COLEOPTERA; TENEBRIONIDAE;

EID: 0141530668     PISSN: 1366638X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025552623766     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Binot M., Bless R., Boye P., Gruttke H. and Pretscher P. 1998. Rote Liste-gerfährdete Tiere Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
2. Burkey T.V. 1995. Extinction rates in archipelagoes: implications for populations in fragmented habitats. Conservation Biology 9: 527 541.
3. Esseen P.-A., Ehnström B., Ericsson L. and Sjöberg K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 16 47.
4. Frankham R. and Ralls K. 1998. Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature 392: 441 442.
5. Fridman J. and Walheim M. 2000. Amount, structure and dynamics of dead wood on managed forest land in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 131: 23 26.
6. Gärdenfors U. (ed.) 2000. The 2000 Red-List of Swedish Species. Artdatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
7. Harris H. and Hopkinson D.A. 1978. Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
8. Hebert P.D.N. and Beaton M.J. 1993. Methodologies for Allozyme Analysis Using Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX.
9. Hutchison D.W. and Templeton A.R. 1999. Correlation of pair-wise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53: 1898-1914.
10. Johannesen J., Samietz J., Wallaschek M., Seitz A. and Veith M. 1999. Patch connectivity and genetic variation in two congeneric grasshopper species with different habitat preferences. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 201-209.
11. Jonsell M. and Nordlander G. 2002. Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood. Forest Ecology and Management 157: 101 118.
12. Jonsell M., Nordlander G. and Ehnström B. 2001. Substrate associations of insects breeding i fruiting bodies of wood-decaying fungi. Ecological Bulletins 49: 173 194.
13. Jonsell M., Schroeder M. and Larsson T., 2003. The saproxylic beetle Bolitophagus reticulates: its frequency in managed forest, attraction to volatiles and flight period. Ecography 26: 421-428.
14. Jonsson M. 2003. Colonisation ability of the threatened tenebrionid beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its common relative Bolitophagus reticulatus. Ecological Entomology 28: 159 167.
15. Jonsson M., Jonsell M. and Nordlander G. 2001. Priorities in conservation biology: a comparison between two polyporeinhabiting beetles. Ecological Bulletins 49: 195-204.
16. Keyghobadi N., Roland J. and Strobeck C. 1999. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology 8: 1481 1495.
17. Kimura M. and Weiss G.H. 1964. The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49: 561 576.
18. Kirby K.J. and Atkins C. (eds.) 1998. The Ecological History of European Forests. CAB International. Oxon.
19. Knutsen H., Rukke B.A.. Jorde P.-E. and Ims R.A. 2000. Genetic differentiation among populations of the beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Heredity 84: 667-676.
20. Koenig W.D., Van Vuren D. and Hooge P.N. 1996 Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. TREE 11: 514-517.
21. Lundberg S. and Gustavsson B. 1995. Catalogus coleopterorum sueciae. Natural History Museum, Stockholm.
22. Lynch M. and Milligan B.G. 1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology 3: 91 99.
23. Manly B.F.S. 1985. The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.
24. Miller M.P. 1997. Tools for Population Genetics (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows Program for the Analysis of Allozyme and Molecular Population Genetic Data. Computer software distributed by author.
25. Nilsson S.G. 1997a. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecological Bulletins 46: 61 71.
26. Nilsson T. 1997b. Spatial population dynamics of the black tinder fungus beetle, Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 311, Acta Univ. Ups., Uppsala.
27. Queller C.Q. and Goodnight K.F. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258-275.
28. Primack R.B. 1993. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
29. Rassi P., Mannerkoski I., Peltonen S.-L. and Alanen A. 2000. 2nd Red Data Book of Finland. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.
30. Raymond M. and Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (V.1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248 249.
31. Roland J., Keyghobadi N. and Fownes S. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642 1653.
32. Rousset F. 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219-1228,
33. Rukke B.A. and Midtgaard F. 1998. The importance of scale and spatial variables for the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented forest landscape. Ecography 21: 561-572.
34. Saccheri I., Kuussaari M., Kankare M., Vikman P., Fortelius W. and Hanski I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491 494.
35. Siitonen J. 2001. Forest management of coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49: 11 41.
36. Slatkin M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 393-430.
37. Stacey P.B., Johnson V.A. and Taper M.L. 1997. Migration within metapopulations: the impact upon local population dynamics. In: Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 267 291.
38. Sverdrup-Thygeson A. and Midtgaard F. 1998. Fungus-infected trees as islands in boreal forest: Spatial distribution of the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: tenebrionidae). Ecoscience 5: 486-493.
39. Thomas C.D. and Hanski I.A. 1997. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 359-386.
40. Weir B.S. and Cockerham C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
41. Whitlock M.C. 1992. Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations. American Naturalist 139: 952-970.