Effects of information frame, response frame, and goal on personnel decision making

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 225-240

  London, Manuel ^a   Casey, Jeff ^a   Chatterjee, Subimal ^a   Hurley, Amy ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Administration Catholic University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141528068     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: 19401019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223989709601966     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1990). Image theory: Behavioral theory of decision making in organizations. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 1-41). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Brockner, J., Wiesenfeid, B. M., & Martin, C. L. (1995). Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors' reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 59-68.
3. Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 491-503.
4. Edwards, J. R. (1992). A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17, 238-274.
5. Fischer, G. W., & Hawkins, S. A. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580-597.
6. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
7. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
9. Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 150-172.
10. Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L. (1993). Category-based and feature-based processes in performance appraisal: Integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 821-830.
11. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Nelson, T. D. (1993). The hierarchical organization of behavior. A useful feedback model of self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 121-126.
13. Payne, J. W. (1980). Information processing theory: Some concepts and methods applied to decision research. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 95-115). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory and Cognition, 21, 546-556.
15. Tindale, R. S., Sheffey, S., & Scott, L. A. (1993). Framing and group decision-making: Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 470-485.
16. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.