A comparison of two feedforward control structure assessment methods

International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing

Volumn 17, Issue 7-9, 2003, Pages 609-624

  Petersson, M ^a,b   Arzen K E ^b   Hagglund T ^b  

^a ABB   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Control structure selection; Feedforward; Minimum variance; Performance assessment

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CONTROL STRUCTURE;

CONTROL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 0141526363     PISSN: 08906327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acs.768     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Harris TJ. Assessment of control loop performance. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1989; 67:856-861.
2. Desborough L, Harris T. Performance assessment measures for univariate feedback control. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1992; 70:1186-1197.
3. Desborough L, Harris T. Performance assessment measures for univariate feedforward/feedback control. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1993; 71:605-616.
4. Harris T, Seppala C, Desborough L. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. Journal of Process Control 1999; 9:1-17.
5. Qin SJ. Control performance monitoring - a review an assessment. Computers and Chemical Engineering 1998; 23:173-186.
6. Petersson M, Årzén K-E, Hägglund T. Assessing measurements for feedforward control. In European Control Conference - ECC01, M. de Carvalho (ed.). Porto, Portugal, September 2001; 432-437.
7. Åström KJ. Computer control of a paper machine - an application of linear stochastic control theory. IBM Journal of Research and Development 1967; 11:389-405.
8. Åström KJ. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. Academic Press: New York, 1970.
9. Eriksson P-G, Isaksson AJ. Some aspects of control loop performance monitoring. In Third IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Glasgow, Scotland, January 1994; 1029-1034.
10. Tyler M, Morari M. On-line segmentation and control performance monitoring: Theory and case study. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, USA, 1995; 1245-1249.
11. Åström KJ, Hägglund T. PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, 2nd edn. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
12. Marlin TE. Process Control, Designing Processes and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance. MCGraw Hill: New York, 1995.
13. Åström KJ, Hägglund T. New tuning methods for PID controllers. In European Control Conference, Rome, Italy, 1995; 2456-2462.
14. Thornhill NF, Shah SL, Huang B. Controller performance assessment in set point tracking and regulatory control. ADCHEM 2000 - International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, IFAC, Pisa, Italy, June 2000; 183-188.
15. Petersson M, Årzén K-E, Sandberg H, de Maré L. Implementation of a tool for control structure assessment. In Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, July 2002.
16. Petersson M, Pernebo L, Hansson B, Årzén K-E, Hägglund T. Control structure assessment in an industrial control system. In Control Systems 2002, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2002.
17. Elnaggar A, Dumont GA, Elshafei A. Delay estimation using variable regression. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Boston, MA, June 1991; 2812-2817.
18. Isaksson M. A comparison of some approaches to time-delay estimation. Technical Report Masters thesis, ISRN LUTFD2/TFRT-5580-SE, Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, June 1997.
19. Isaksson AJ, Horch A, Dumont GA. Event-triggered deadtime estimation from closed-loop data. In American Control Conference, vol. 6, Arlington, VA, USA, 2001.
20. Rhinehart RR. A watchdog for controller performance monitoring. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, USA, 1995; 2239-2240.
21. Horch A. Condition monitoring of control loops. Ph.D. Thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, January 2000. TRITA-S3-REG-0002.
22. Gustafsson F. Adaptive Filtering and Change Detection. Wiley: New York, July 2000.
23. Åström KJ. Assessment of achievable performance of simple feedback loops. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 1991; 5:3-19.