The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture [1] (multiple letters)

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 189, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 895-896

  Joura, Elmar A ^a   Nather, Andreas ^a   Hohlagschwandtner, Maria ^a   Husslein, Peter ^a   Bujold, Emmanuel ^b   Gauthier, Robert J ^b   Hamilton, Emily F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b HUTZEL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIC CATGUT; POLYGLACTIC ACID; SUTURE MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CESAREAN SECTION; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERUS RUPTURE; UTERUS SURGERY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 0141525035     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00637-9     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. S.J. Chapman J. Owen J.C. Hauth One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 16 18
2. C. Durnwald B. Mercer Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single layer closure at cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 Suppl 2002 S65
3. J.C. Hauth J. Owen R.O. Davis Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers Am J Obstet Gynecol 167 1992 1108 1111