It takes a team to differentially diagnose APD

Hearing Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 71-

  Chermak, Gail D ^a   Musiek, Frank E ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NOTE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0141521736     PISSN: 07457472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293914.81047.29     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Jerger J, Musiek FE: Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. JAAA 2000;11:467-474.
2. Chermak GD, Musiek FE: Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997.
3. Denckla MB: A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In Lyon GR, Krasnegor NA, eds. Attention, Memory, and Executive Function. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1996: 263-278.
4. Fitch RH, Miller S, Tallal P: Neurobiology of speech perception. Neurosci 1997;20:331-353.
5. Hasegawa RP, Blitz AM, Geller NL, Goldberg ME: Neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex that track past or predict future performance. Science 2000;290:1786-1789.
6. Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB: Central auditory processing disorders and reduced motivation: Three case studies. JAAA 2000;11(2):57-63.
7. Poremba A, Saunders RC, Crane AM, et al.: Functional mapping of the primate auditory system. Science 2003;299:568-571.
8. Crosson BA: Subcortical Functions in Language and Memory. New York: Guilford, 1992.
9. Phillips DP: Central auditory processing: A view from auditory neuroscience. Am J Otol 1995;16(3):338-352.
10. Phillips DP: Auditory gap detection, perceptual channels, and temporal resolution in speech perception. JAAA 1999;10:343-354.
11. Salvi RJ, Lockwood AH, Frisina RD, et al.: PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: Responses to speech in quiet and in background noise. Hear Res 2002;170:96-106.
12. McFarland DJ, Cacace AT: Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. AJA 1995;4:36-48.
13. Jerger J, Thibodeau L, Martin J, et al.: Behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence of auditory processing disorder: A twin study. JAAA 2000;13:438-460.
14. McFarland DJ, Cacace AT. Modality specificity of auditory and visual pattern recognition: Implications for the assessment of central auditory processing disorders. Audiology 1997;36:249-260.
15. Riccio CA, Reynolds CR, Lowe PA: Clinical Applications of Continuous Performance Tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
16. Chermak GD, Hall J, Musiek FE: Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. JAAA 1999;10:289-303.