Electronic data transfer systems for field monitoring

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering

Volumn 156, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 47-55

  Richards, D J ^a   Chandler, R J ^b   Lock, A C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Key Systems Geotechnical Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Field testing and monitoring; Information technology

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DATA TRANSFER; MONITORING; VISUALIZATION;

ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSFER;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

DATA MANAGEMENT; FIELD METHOD; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; MONITORING; SITE INVESTIGATION;

EID: 0141502520     PISSN: 13532618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/geng.2003.156.1.47     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. ASSOCIATION OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS. Electronic Transfer of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Data, 3rd edn. AGS, 1999 (available at www.ags.org.uk).
2. PECK R. B. Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Géotechnique, 1969, 19, No. 2, 171-187.
3. NICHOLSON D, TSE C. M. and PENNY C. The Observational Method in Ground Engineering; Principles and Applications. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, Funders Report CP/49.
4. BATTEN M. and POWRIE W. Measurement and analysis of temporary prop loads at Canary Wharf underground station, east London. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 143, 151-163.
5. CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATION. Geotechnical Monitoring Information Interchange (GEMINI) Standard. CIRIA, London, 1998, Procedural Note RP504/E issued to the funders of Research Project 504.
6. WITHERS A., PONTIN S. and BLACK M. The geotechnical database for the Jubilee Line Extension Project. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 143, 117-173.
7. CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATION. CIRIA, London, 2002, RP631.