Implications of an individualistic lifestyle for species conservation: Lessons from jealous beasts

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 326, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Lodé, Thierry ^a   Pereboom, Vincent ^a   Berzins, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Genetic neighbourhood; Inbreeding; Mustela lutreola; Mustela putorius; Mustelidae; Social behaviour

Indexed keywords

GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; MUSTELID; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ALLOENZYME VARIATION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CAT; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EUROPE; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INBREEDING; INDIVIDUALITY; JEALOUSY; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MATING SYSTEM; MINK; NONHUMAN; POLYGYNY; POPULATION SIZE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

MUSTELA; MUSTELA LUTREOLA; MUSTELA PUTORIUS; MUSTELA VISON; MUSTELIDAE;

EID: 0141494434     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00024-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. A. Pusey, Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals, TREE 11 (1987) 201-206.
2. R.K. Chesser, Influence f gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations, Genetics 129 (1991) 573-583.
3. R.K. Chesser, O.E. Rhodes, D.W. Sugg, A. Schnabel, Effective sizes for subdivided populations, Genetics 135 (1993) 1221-1232.
4. M. Soulce, Viable Populations for Conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
5. R. Frankham, K. Ralls, Inbreeding leads to extinction, Nature 392 (1998) 441-442.
6. M.L. Bonnell, R.K. Selander, Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction, Science 184 (1974) 908-909.
7. J.L. Gittleman, Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, Cornell University Press, New York, 1989.
8. T. Lodé, Functional response and area-restricted search of a predator: seasonal exploitation of anurans by European polecat Mustela putorius, Autral. Ecology 25 (2000) 223-231.
9. B. Miller, C. Wemmer, D. Biggins, Reading R., A proposal to conserve Black-Footed ferrets and the Prairie Dog ecosystem, Environmental Management 14 (1990) 763-769.
10. T. Maran, H. Henttonen, Why is the European mink (Mustela lutreola) disappearing? A review of the process and hypotheses, Annales Zoologica Fennica 32 (1995) 47-54.
11. T. Lodé, J.P. Cormier, D. Le Jacques, Decline in endangered species as an indication of anthropic pressures: the case of European mink Mustela lutreola western population, Environmental Management 28 (2001) 727-735.
12. R.A. Powell, Mustelids spacing patterns: variations on a theme by Mustela, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 50 (1979) 153-155.
13. S. Wright, in: The theory of gene frequencies, in: Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969.
14. R. Frankham, Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review, Genetic Research 66 (1995) 95-107.
15. M. Begon, C.B. Krimbas, M. Loukas, The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XV. Effective size of a natural population estimated by three independent methods, Heredity 45 (1980) 335-350.
16. L. Nunney, The influence e of mating system and overlapping generations and effective population size, Evolution 47 (1993) 1329-1341.
17. T. Lodé, Conspecific tolerance and sexual segregation in European polecat, Acta Theriologica 41 (1996) 171-176.
18. G.C. White, K.P. Burnham, Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals, Bird Study (Suppl.) 46 (1999) 120-138.
19. J.D. Lebreton, K.P. Burnham, J. Clobert, D.R. Anderson, Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies, Ecological Monographs 62 (1992) 67-118.
20. D. Weber, Zur populationsbiologie schweizerischer Iltisses (Mustela putorius L.), Zeitschrift für Jagdwiss 35 (1989) 86-99.
21. T. Lodé, Genetic heterozygosity in polecat Mustela putorius populations from western France, Hereditas 129 (1998) 259-261.
22. T. Lodé, Mating system and genetic variance in a polygynous mustelid, the European polecat, Genes and Genetic Systems 76 (2001) 221-227.
23. N. Pasteur, G. Pasteur, F. Bonhomme, J. Catalan, J. Britton-Davidian, Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorèse des protéines, Lavoisier, Paris, 1987.
24. G.M. Rothe, Electrophoresis of Enzymes, Laboratory Methods, Springer-Verlag, London, 1994.
25. K. Belkhir, P. Borsa, J. Goudet, L. Chikhi, F. Bonhomme, Genetix version 3.3, Laboratoire Génome and Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Montpellier, France, 1996, 1997, 1998.
26. M. Sandell, Movement patterns of mate stoat Mustela erminea during the mating season: differences in relation to social status, Oikos 47 (1986) 63-70.
27. B.K. Clapperton, Scent marking behaviour of the ferret (Mustela furo L.), Animal Behaviour 38 (1989) 436-446.
28. P.J. Greenwood, Mating systems, phylopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals, Animal Behaviour 28 (1980) 1140-1162.
29. P.J. Greenwood, Mating systems and the evolutionary consequences of dispersal, in: I.R. Swingland, P.J. Breenwodd (Eds.), The ecology of animal movement, 1983, pp. 116-131.
30. M. Slatkin, Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations, Science 236 (1987) 787-792.
31. D.W. Sugg, R.K. Chesser, F.S. Dobson, J.L. Hoogland, Population genetics meets behavioral ecology, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 (1996) 338-342.
32. G.B. Hartl, R. Willing, M. Grillitsch, E. Klansek, Biochemical variation in Mustelidae: Are carnivores genetically less variable than other mammals, Zool. Anz. 221 (1988) 90-91.
33. T. Lodé, Genetic bottleneck in the threatened western population of European mink Mustela lutreola, Italian Journal of Zoology 66 (1999) 351-353.
34. D. Weber, Foraging in polecats Mustela putorius L. of Switzerland: the case of a specialist anuran predator, Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 54 377-392.
35. R. Frankham, J.D. Ballou, D.A. Briscoe, Introduction to Conservation Genetics, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
36. I.R. Franklin, Evolutionary changes in small populations, in: M.E. Soulé, B.A. Wilcox (Eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, 1980, pp. 135-149.
37. M.E. Soulé, Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential, in: M.E. Soulé, B.A. Wilcox (Eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, 1980, pp. 151-170.
38. I.R. Franklin, R. Frankham, How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential?, Animal Conservation 1 (1998) 69-73.
39. R. Lande, Mutation and conservation, Conservation Biology 9 (1995) 782-791.
40. M. Lynch, R. Lande, The critical size for a genetically secure population, Animal Conservation 1 (1998) 70-72.
41. I.D. Thompson, Marten populations in mature and logged forests in Ontario, Journal of Wildlife Management 58 (1994) 272-280.