Light squeezing at the transition to quantum chaos

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 4023-4034

  Alekseev, Kirill N ^a,b   Peřina, Jan ^c  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b KIRENSKY INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^c PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141486415     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.4023     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. For an experiment, see, J. E. Beyfield and P. M. Koch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 258 (1974);
2. K. A. H. van Leeuwen, G. V. Oppen, S. Renwick, J. B. Bowlin, P. M. Koch, R. V. Jensen, O. Rath, D. Richards, and J. G. Leopold, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2231 (1985).
3. For a theory, see, J. G. Leopold and I. C. Percival, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 944 (1978);
4. B. I. Meerson, E. A. Oks, and P. U. Sasorov, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 29, 79 (1979) [JETP Lett. 29, 72 (1979)]; JTPLA2
5. D. A. Jones, J. G. Leopold, and I. C. Percival, J. Phys. B 13, 31 (1980).JPAMA4
6. For a review see J. E. Bayfield, in Chaos-Xaoc, Soviet-American Perspectives on Nonlinear Science, edited by D. K. Campbell (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1990), p. 433;
7. P. M. Koch, ibid., p. 441.
8. For an experiment see T. B. Simpson, J. G. Black, I. Burak, E. Yablonovitch, and N. Blombergen, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 628 (1985), and references therein.JCPSA6
9. For a theory see E. V. Shuryak, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 71, 2039 (1976) [Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 1070 (1976);
10. J. R. Ackerhalt and P. W. Milonni, Phys. Rev. A 34, 1211 (1986);
11. AJ. R. AckerhaltP. W. Milonni Phys. Rev.34, 5137 (1986).
12. R. Roy, T. W. Murphy, Jr., T. D. Maier, and Z. Gills, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1259 (1992);
13. R. Roy, Z. Gills, and K. S. Thornburg, Opt. Photonics News 5, 8 (1994).
14. E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990).
15. K. M. Cuomo and A. V. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 65 (1993).
16. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990).
17. D. S. Dabby, Chaos 6, 95 (1996).
18. G. M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rep. 80, 175 (1981).
19. M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1991).
20. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
21. L. E. Reichl, The Transition to Chaos: Quantum Manifestations (Springer, Berlin, 1992).
22. Chaos and Quantum Physics, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics, Les Houches, France, 1989, Session LIL, edited by M. J. Giannoni, A. Voros, and J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).
23. G. Casati and B. V. Chirikov, Physica D 86, 220 (1995).
24. G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, and D. L. Shepelansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2525 (1984);
25. G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, I. Guarneri, and D. L. Shepelansky, Phys. Rep. 154, 77 (1987).
26. S. Fishman, D. Grempel, and R. Prange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1639 (1984).
27. E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
28. R. V. Jensen, M. M. Sanders, M. Saraceno, and B. Sundaram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2771 (1989).
29. J. R. Kuklinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2507 (1990).
30. D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
31. J. Peřina, Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991).
32. S. Reynaud, A. Heidmann, E. Giacobino and C. Fabre, in Progress in Optics XXX, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992), p. 1.
33. C. Fabre, Phys. Rep. 219, 215 (1992).
34. To our knowledge, enhanced light squeezing at the transition to quantum chaos was predicted in 27. Enhanced light squeezing at the transition to chaos in the generalized Tavis-Cummings model was studied in detail in 28. Strong squeezing of wave packets on a time scale of well-defined quantum-classical correspondence has been discussed by B. V. Chirikov as a characteristic of quantum chaos 29 (see also Sec. 3.1 in 16). Our present consideration of the problem is an extension of 30.
35. K. N. Alekseev, Kirensky Institute of Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Report No. 674F, 1991.
36. K. N. Alekseev, Opt. Commun. 116, 468 (1995).OPCOB8
37. B. V. Chirikov (unpublished).
38. Kirill N. Alekseev and Jan Pěrina, Phys. Lett. A 231, 373 (1997).
39. A. Lichtenberg and M. Lieberman, Regular and Stochastic Motion (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983).
40. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica A 91, 450 (1978);
41. M. Berry, N. Balazs, M. Tabor, and A. Voros, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 122, 26 (1979).APNYA6
42. After delocalization of the wave packet, the quantum-classical correspondence may be defined using only a statistical description, in spite of the fact that some semiclassical tools are still valid; see, for example, E. J. Heller and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 664 (1991);
43. E. J. HellerS. TomsovicPhys. Today 46, (7), 38 (1993).
44. L. A. Lugiato, P. Galatola, and L. M. Narducci, Opt. Commun. 76, 276 (1990).OPCOB8
45. A. Heidmann, J. M. Raimond, and S. Reynaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 326 (1985).
46. A. Heidmann, J. M. Raimond, S. Reynaud, and N. Zagury, Opt. Commun. 54, 189 (1985).OPCOB8
47. A very nice discussion of strong squeezing near bifurcation points is presented in Ref. 25, Sec. 3.2.1, and references cited therein.
48. R. Schak and A. Schenzle, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3847 (1990).
49. L. G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 407 (1982).
50. J. Peřina, J. Křepelka, R. Horák, Z. Hradil, and J. Bajer, Czech. J. Phys. Sect. B 37, 1161 (1987);
51. P. Szlachetka, K. Grygiel, J. Bajer, and J. Peřina, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7311 (1992).
52. J. Peřina, J. Bajer, J. Křepelka, and Z. Hradil, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 965 (1987).
53. P. Szlachetka, K. Grygiel, and J. Bajer, Phys. Rev. E 48, 101 (1993).PLEEE8
54. B. Sundaram and P. W. Milonni, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1971 (1995).PLEEE8
55. K. N. Alekseev, G. P. Berman, A. V. Butenko, A. K. Popov, A. V. Shalaev, and V. Z. Yakhnin, J. Mod. Opt. 37, 41 (1990).
56. See, e.g., Section 4.1.4 in Ref. 23.
57. K. N. Alekseev and J. Peřina (unpublished).
58. Strictly speaking, the problem of second-harmonic generation does not belong to the class of systems (3). We analyze in this paper single-mode quantum systems with an explicit time dependence. However, the examples of second-harmonic generation and optical three-wave mixing problems demonstrate that the extension of our formalism to the case of multimode quantum models is straightforward, at least for the case of simple powerwise nonlinearity.
59. A. Lukš, V. Peřinová, and J. Peřina, Opt. Commun. 67, 149 (1988).OPCOB8
60. R. Tanaś, A. Miranowicz, and S. Kielich, Phys. Rev. A 43, 4014 (1991).
61. V. V. Beloshapkin and G. M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Lett. 97A, 121 (1983).
62. Note that quick growth of the variance with time for regular trajectories located near chaotic trajectories has been observed in the direct numerical simulation of dynamics of very narrow wave packets in the model of a kicked quantum rotator by B. L. Lan and R. F. Fox, Phys. Rev. A 43, 646 (1991), and in recent work 55.
63. G. S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A 51, R2711 (1995), and references therein.
64. V. Peřinová and A. Lukš, in Progress in Optics XXXIII, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994), p. 130.
65. K. N. Alekseev and G. P. Berman, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 88, 968 (1985) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 61, 569 (1985)].
66. K. N. Alekseev and D.S. Prijmak, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Phys. 113, 111 (1998) [JETP (to be published)].