Size structure of current-year shoots in mature crowns

Annals of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 339-347

  Suzuki, Maki ^a,b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acer mono var. mayrii (Schwer.) Koidz.; Allometry; Betula maximowicziana Regel; Biomass allocation; Current year shoot population; Deciduous broad leaved trees; First order branch; Mature crown; Pipe model relationship; Shoot size structure

Indexed keywords

SHOOT; SIZE STRUCTURE;

ACER; ACER MONO; BETULA MAXIMOWICZIANA; ACER MONO SUBSP. MAYRII; QUERCUS CRISPULA;

ACER; ARTICLE; BIRCH; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; OAK; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; TREE;

ACER; BETULA; PLANT COMPONENTS, AERIAL; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT SHOOTS; QUERCUS; TREES;

EID: 0141462765     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg144     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Addicott FT. 1991. Abscission: shedding of parts. In: Raghavendra AS. ed. Physiology of trees. New York: Wiley Interscience, 273-300.
2. Baskerville GL. 1971. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2: 49-53.
3. Berninger F, Nikinmaa E. 1994. Foliage area-sapwood area relationships of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees in different climates. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 2263-2268.
4. Buck-Sorlin GH, Bell AD. 1998. A quantification of shoot shedding in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 371-391.
5. Cannell MGR. 1974. Production of branches and foliage by young trees of Pinus contorta and Picea sitchensis: provenance differences and their simulation. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 1091-1115.
6. Chiba Y. 1990. Plant form based on the pipe model theory. I. A statistical model within the crown. Ecological Research 5: 207-220.
7. Cochrane LA, Ford ED. 1978. Growth of a sitka spruce plantation: analysis and stochastic description of the development of the branching architecture. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 227-244.
8. Dvorak V, Oplustilova M, Janous D. 1996. Relation between leaf biomass and annual ring sapwood of Norway spruce according to needle age-class. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1822-1827.
9. Farnsworth KD, Niklas KJ. 1995. Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Functional Ecology 9: 355-363.
10. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical trees and forests. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Hiura T, Fujiwara K, Hojo H, Okada J, Udo H, Okuyama S, Morita H, Fukuta H, Fujito E, Fukui T et al. 1995. Stand structure and long-term dynamics of primeval forests in Nakagawa experimental forest, Hokkaido University. Research Bulletin of Hokkaido University Forest 52: 85-94.
12. Koike F. 1989. Foliage-crown development and interaction in Quercus gilca and Quercus acuta. Journal of Ecology 77: 92-111.
13. Koyama H, Kira T. 1956. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VIII. Frequency distribution of individual plant weight as affected by the interaction between plants. Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University 7: 73-94.
14. Kozlowski TT. 1971. Growth and development of trees. New York: Academic Press.
15. Long J, Smith FW. 1988. Leaf area-sapwood area relations of lodgepole pine as influenced by stand density and site index. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 247-250.
16. McGraw JB. 1989. Effects of age and size on life histories and population growth of Rhododendron maxim shoots. Annals of Botany 76: 113-123.
17. Maillette L. 1982. Structural dynamics of silver birch. I. The fates of buds. Journal of Applied Ecology 19: 203-218.
18. Nagy M. 1992. Architecture of the shoot system of Quercus petraea (Matt.) LIEBL. Acta Botanica Hungarica 37: 239-249.
19. Remphrey WR, Steeves TA, Neal BR. 1983. The morphology and growth of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi(bearberry): an architectural analysis. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 2430-2450.
20. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T. 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14: 97-105.
21. Stoll P, Schmid B. 1998. Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments. Journal of Ecology 86: 934-945.
22. Suzuki M, Hiura T. 2000. Allometric difference between current-year shoots and large branches of deciduous broad-leaved tree species. Tree Physiology 20: 203-209.
23. Takenaka A. 1997. Structural variation in current-year shoots of broad-leaved evergreen tree saplings under forest canopies in warm temperate Japan. Tree Physiology 17: 205-210.
24. Takenaka A. 2000. Shoot growth responses to light microenvironment and correlative inhibition in tree seedling under a forest canopy. Tree Physiology 20: 987-991.
25. Waring RH, Thies WG, Muscato D. 1980. Stem growth per unit of leaf area: a measure of tree vigour. Forest Science 26: 112-117.
26. Whitehead D, Edwards WRN, Jarvis PG. 1984. Conducting sapwood area, foliage area and permaeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Picea contorta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14: 940-947.
27. Wilson BF. 1987. Tree branches as population of twigs. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 434-442.
28. Wilson BF. 1991. Shoot-length frequencies in black birch (Betula lenta). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 1475-1480.
29. Yagi T. 2000. Morphology and biomass allocation of current-year shoots of ten tall tree species in cool temperate Japan. Journal of Plant Research 113: 171-183.
30. Yagi T, Kikuzawa K. 1999. Patterns in size-related variations in current-year shoot structure in eight deciduous tree species. Journal of Plant Research 112: 343-352.