Quantum-correlated double-well tunneling of two-component Bose-Einstein condensates

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Ng, H T ^a   Law, C K ^a   Leung, P T ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ATOMS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRON GAS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; HAMILTONIANS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; QUANTUM THEORY;

ATOM-ATOM INTERACTION; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; QUANTUM-CORRELATED DOUBLE-WELL TUNNELING; TWO-COMPONENT BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES;

ELECTRON TUNNELING;

EID: 0141460810     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. B.P. Anderson and M.A. Kasevich, Science 282, 1686 (1998).
2. F.S. Cataliotti et al., Science 293, 843 (2001).
3. A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997).
4. G.J. Milburn, J. Corney, E.M. Wright, and D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318 (1997).
5. S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999).
6. J.E. Williams, Phys. Rev. A 64, 013610 (2001).
7. T.-L. Ho and V.B. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3276 (1996)
8. H. Pu and N.P. Bigelow, ibid. 80, 1130 (1998)
9. E. Timmermans, ibid. 81, 5718 (1998).
10. D.S. Hall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1539 (1998).
11. E.V. Goldstein, M.G. Moore, H. Pu, and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5030 (2000).
12. C.K. Law, H. Pu, N.P. Bigelow, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 58, 531 (1998).
13. S. Ashhab and C. Lobo, Phys. Rev. A 66, 013609 (2002).
14. H. Pu, W. Zhang, and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 090401 (2002).
15. K. Molmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 110403 (2003).
16. A. Imamoglu, M. Lewenstein, and L. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2511 (1997).
17. J. Javanainen and M.Y. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2351 (1999).
18. For systems with multiple potential wells such as optical lattice, a similar form of the effective Hamiltonian has been discussed recently, see A.B. Kuklov and B.V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 100401 (2003).
19. Quite generally, a strong coupling would force quantum systems to evolve in a limited subspace. A formal discussion in the context of quantum Zeno effect was given by P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 080401 (2002).
20. C.K. Law, H. Pu, and N.P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257 (1998)
21. E.V. Goldstein and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3896 (1999).
22. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993).
23. L.-M. Duan, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033619 (2002)
24. A. Sorensen, L.M. Duan, I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 409, 63 (2001)
25. K. Helmerson and L. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 170402 (2001)
26. B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E.S. Polzik, Nature (London) 413, 400 (2001).
27. A. Pere, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995).
28. A. Trifonov et al., J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 2, 105 (2000)
29. N.K. Tran and O. Pfister, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052313 (2002).