Secondary school teachers' attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 343-356

  Hallam, Susan ^a   Ireson, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APTITUDE; ATTITUDE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER GROUP; REVIEW; SCHOOL; TEACHING;

ADULT; APTITUDE; ATTITUDE; CULTURE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEER GROUP; SCHOOLS; TEACHING;

EID: 0141455136     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709903322275876     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Ball, S.J. (1981). Beachside Comprehensive: A case-study of secondary schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barker Lunn, J.C. (1970). Streaming in the primary school. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
3. Burgess, R.G. (1983). Experiencing comprehensive education: A study of Bishop McGregor School. London: Methuen
4. Burgess, R.G. (1984). It's not a proper subject: It's just Newsom. In I. Goodson & S. Ball (Eds.), Defining the curriculum (pp. 181-200). London: Falmer.
5. Carlgren, I., Handal, G., & Vaage, S. (1994). Teachers' minds and actions: Research on teachers' thinking and practice. London: Falmer Press.
6. Clammer, R. (1985). Mixed ability teaching: Meanings and motives. A study of two geography departments. SERCH, 7, 17-19.
7. Clark, C.M., & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
8. Daniels, J.C. (1961a). The effects of streaming in the primary schools: I. What teachers believe. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 69-78
9. Daniels, J.C. (1961b). The effects of streaming in the primary schools: II. Comparison of streamed and unstreamed schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 119-126.
10. Findlay, W., & Bryan, M. (1975). The pros and cons of ability grouping. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 12.
11. Finley, M.K (1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243.
12. Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415-435.
13. Guttman, Y., Gur, A., Daniel, S., & Well, D. (1972) The effects of ability grouping on learning achievements and psychosocial development. Jerusalem: Szold Institute.
14. Hallam, S., & Toutounji, I. (1996). What do we know about the grouping of pupils by ability? London: Institute of Education, University of London.
15. Hargreaves, D.H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. London: Tinling.
16. Harlen, W., & Malcolm, H. (1997). Setting and streaming: A research review (Using Research Series 18). Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Educational Research.
17. Husen, T., & Boalt, G. (1967). Educational research and educational change: The case of Sweden. Stockholm: Almquist.
18. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 343-358.
19. Jackson, B. (1964). Streaming: An education system in miniature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown Grammar. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21. McDermott, J.W. (1976). The controversy over ability grouping in American education, 1916-1970. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia. Xerox, University Microfilms.
22. Ministry of Education (Israel) (1965). Survey of grouping. Jerusalem: The Pedagogic Secretariat (Hebrew).
23. NEA (1968). Ability grouping: Research summary. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
24. Newbold, D. (1977). Ability grouping: The Banbury enquiry. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
25. Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y.F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.
26. Reid, M.E., Clunies-Ross, L.R., Goacher, B., & Vile, D. (1982). Mixed ability teaching: Problems and possibilities. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
27. Rosenbaum, J.E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York: Wiley
28. Schwartz, F. (1981) Supporting or subverting learning: Peer groups' patterns in four tracked schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12, 99-121.
29. Sorenson, A.B., & Hallinan, M.T. (1986). Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 519-542.
30. Sukhnandan, L., & Lee, B. (1998). Streaming, setting and grouping by ability. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
31. Taylor, N. (1993). Ability grouping and its effect on pupil behaviour: A case study of a Midlands comprehensive school. Education Today, 43(2), 14-17.
32. Wilson, B.J., & Schmidts, D.W. (1978). What's new in ability grouping? Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 535-536.