Confidence limit of the magnetotelluric phase sensitive skew

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 451-457

  Lezaeta, Pamela ^a,b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; CONDUCTIVITY; ERROR ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY;

EID: 0141448606     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03353036     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bahr, K., Geological noise in magnetotelluric data: a classification of distortion types, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 66, 24-38, 1991.
2. Brandt, S., Datenanalyse, 651 pp., Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1992.
3. Dudewicz, E. J. and S. N. Mishira, Modern Mathematical Statistics, 838 pp., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988.
4. Egbert, G. D. and J. R. Booker, Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer function, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 87, 173-194, 1986.
5. Fisz, M., Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und Mathematische Statistik, Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1976.
6. Mackie, R. and J. Booker, Documentation for mtd3fwd and d3-to-mt, User Documentation, GSY-USA, Inc., 2261 Market St., Suite 643, San Francisco, CA 94114, 1999.
7. Mackie, R. L., J. T. Smith, and T. Madden, Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: The magnetotelluric example, Radio Sci., 29, 923-936, 1994.
8. SFB 267, Deformation Processes in the Andes, Interaction between endogenic and exogenic processes during subduction orogenesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Technische Universität Berlin, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Universität Potsdam, Report for the research period 1999-2001, pp. 239-268, Berlin/Potsdam, March, 2001.