A complexity theory model in science education problem solving: Random walks for working memory and mental capacity

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 221-244

  Stamovlasis, Dimitrios ^a   Tsaparlis, Georgios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Complexity theory; Entropy; Fractal dimension; Mental capacity; Mental demand of problems; Mental schemata; Order; Science problem solving; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; EDUCATION; GREECE; HUMAN; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SCIENCE; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; CHEMISTRY; GREECE; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCIENCE; STUDENTS;

EID: 0141447546     PISSN: 10900578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022810500672     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Arecchi, F. T. (2001). Complexity versus complex systems: A new approach to scientific discovery. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 21-35.
2. Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes, in K. W. Spence (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 2 (pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. London: Erlbaum.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1992a). Is working memory working? The fifteenth Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 1-31.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (1992b). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
7. Baddeley, A. (1994). The magical number seven: Still magic after all these years? Psychological Review, 101, 353-356.
8. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5-28.
9. Baddeley, A. D. & Logie, R. H. (1992). Auditory imagery and working memory. I. D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery, (pp. 521-539). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bunde, A. & Havlin, S. (1994). Fractals in science. Springer-Verlag.
11. Cabeza, R. & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1-47.
12. Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied chaos theory. NY: Academic Press.
13. Case, R. (1978). Piaget and beyond: Toward a developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 167-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Case, R. (1991). Advantages and limitations of neo-Piagetian position. In R. Case (Ed.), The mind's staircase (pp 37-51). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Chi, M. Y. H. (1978) Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73-96). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Della Sala S. & Logie, R. H. (1993). When working memory does not work: The role of working memory in neuropsychology. In F. Boller & Spinnler (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology. Vol. 8 (pp. 1-63). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17. Dempster, F. N. (1981). Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental difference. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 63-100.
18. Dooley, K. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1998). A primer on diagnosing dynamical organizational processes. Paper presented at 8th Annual Conference of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Science, Boston.
19. Feller, W. (1957). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
20. Furey, M. L., Pietrini, P., Haxby, J. V. (2000). Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory, Science, 290, 2315-2319.
21. Halford, G. (1982). Development of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbraum.
22. Johnson, J. M. (1982). The Figural Intersection Test (FIT): A measure of mental (M) attentional energy. Unpublished manuscript. Ontario: York University.
23. Johnstone, A. H. (1984). New stars for the teacher to steer by? Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 847-849.
24. Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Naeme, F. F. (1991). Room for scientific thought? International Journal of Science Education, 13, 187-192.
25. Johnstone, A. H. & El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacities, demands and processes - A predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23, 80-84.
26. Johnstone, A. H. & El-Banna, H. (1989). Understanding learning difficulties - A predictive research model. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 159-168.
27. Johnstone, A. H., Hogg, W. R., & Ziane, M. (1993). A working memory model applied to physics problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 663-672.
28. Johnstone, A. H. & Kellet, N. C. (1980). Learning difficulties in school science - Towards a working hypothesis. European Journal of Science Education, 2, 175-181.
29. McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory - A century of consolidation. Science, 287, 248-251.
30. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
31. Miller, G. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limitation on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101, 343-352.
32. Morra, S., Miozo, C. & Stopesi, A. (1988). Working memory (or the M operator) and the planning of children's drawings, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 41-73.
33. Morra, S., & Stoffel, C. (1991). A comparison of two developmental models of verbal STM span. Paper presented at the International Conference on Memory, University of Lancaster, UK, July.
34. Niaz, M. (1987). Relation between M-space of students and M-demand of different items of general chemistry and its interpretation based upon the neo-Piagetian theory of Pascual-Leone. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 502-505.
35. Niaz, M. (1988a). The information processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual-Leone's functional M-capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 231-238.
36. Niaz, M. (1988b). Manipulation of M-demand of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance: A neo-Piagetian study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 643-657.
37. Niaz, M. (1989a). Relation between Pascual-Leone's structural and functional M-space and its effect on problem solving in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 93-99.
38. Niaz, M. (1989b). Dimensional analysis: A neo-Piagetian evaluation of M-demand of chemistry problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 7, 153-170.
39. Niaz, M. (1989c). The relationship between M-demand, algorithms, and problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 422-424.
40. Niaz, M. (1991). Correlates of formal operational reasoning: A neo-Piagetian analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 19-40.
41. Niaz, M. (1994). Pascual-Leone's theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Educational Psychology, 14, 23-43.
42. Niaz, M. (1996). Reasoning strategies of students in solving chemistry problems as a function of developmental level, functional M-capacity and disembedding ability. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 525-541.
43. Niaz, M., & Lawson A. E. (1985). Balancing chemical equations: The role of developmental level and mental capacity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 41-51.
44. Niaz, M., & Logie, R. H. (1993). Working memory, mental capacity and science education: Towards an understanding of the 'working memory overload hypothesis'. Oxford Review of Education, 19, 511-525.
45. Niaz, M., & Robinson, W. R. (1992). Manipulation of logical structure of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 211-226.
46. Nicolis, J. S., & Tsuda. I. (1985). Chaotic dynamics of information processing: The "magic number seven plus-minus two" revisited. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 47, 343-365.
47. Opdenacker, C., Fierens, H., Brabant, I.V., Spruyt, J., Slootmaekers, P. J., & Johnstone, A. H. (1990). Academic performance in solving chemistry problems related to student working memory capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 177-185.
48. Pascual-Leone, J. (1969). The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: A new experimental Paradigm and neo-Piagetian model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 328-355.
49. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345.
50. Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectal causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531-570.
51. Pascual-Leone, J., & Burtis, P. J. (1974). FIT: Figural Intersection Test, a group measure of M-space. Unpublished manuscript. Ontario: York University.
52. Pascual-Leone & Goodman, D. (1979). Intelligence and experience. Instructional Science, 8, 301-367.
53. Pascual-Leone, J., Goodman, D., Ammon, P. & Subelman, I. (1978). Piagetian theory and neo-Piagetian analysis as psychological guides in education. In: J. M. Gallagher & J. A. Easley (Eds.), Knowledge and development, Vol. 2 (pp. 234-289), New York: Plenum.
54. Peitgen, H. O., Jurgens, H., & Saupe, D. (1992). Chaos and fractal. Berlin: Springer.
55. Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S. V. Goldberger, A. L., Halvin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H. E. (1993). Finite-size effects on long-range correlation: Implication for analyzing DNA sequences. Physical Review E, 47, 3730.
56. Robbins, T. W., Mehta, M. A., Sahakian, B. J. (2000). Boosting working memory. Science, 290, 2275-2277.
57. Scandarmalia, M. (1977). Information processing capacity and the problem of horizontal de-calage: A demonstration using combinatorial reasoning task. Child Psychology, 48, 301-345.
58. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Simon, A. H. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482-488.
60. Shiffrin, R. M., and Nosofsky, R. M. (1994). Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations. Psychological Review, 101, 357-361.
61. Smith, E. & Jonides, J. (1997). Working Memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5-42.
62. Sprott, J. C. & Rowlands, G. (1995). Chaos data analyzer. NY: Physics Academic Software.
63. Stamovlasis, D. & Tsaparlis G. (2001). Application of complexity theory to an information-processing model in science education. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 5, 267-286.
64. Tsaparlis, G. (1998). Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 335-350.
65. Tsaparlis, G. & Angelopoulos, V. (2000). A model of problem solving: Its operation, validity, and usefulness in the case of organic-synthesis problems. Science Education, 84, 131-153.
66. Tsaparlis, G., Kousathana, M., & Niaz, M. (1998). Molecular-equilibrium problems: Manipulation of logical structure and of M-demand, and their effect on student performance. Science Education, 82, 437-454.
67. Tschacher, W., Scheier, C., Grawe, K., (1998). Order and pattern formation in psychotherapy. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 2, 195-215.
68. Voss, R. F., (1992). Evolution of long-range fractal correlations and 1/f noise in DNA sequence. Physical Review Letters, 68, 3805.
69. Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., & Farmer, J. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58, 77-94.
70. Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler adult intelligence scale manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
71. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.