Power of quantum entanglement

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 96, Issue , 2002, Pages 3-22

  Gruska, Jozef ^a   Imai, Hiroshi ^b   Matsumoto, Keiji ^b  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; QUANTUM COMMUNICATION; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS; OF QUANTUM-INFORMATION; QUANTUM FEATURES; QUANTUM INFORMATION SCIENCE; QUANTUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; QUANTUM PHYSICS; QUANTUM-INFORMATION PROCESSING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 0141432423     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35608-2_1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. A. Acin, D. Brufi, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera. Classification of mixed three-qubit states, quant-ph/0103025, 2001.
2. Ch. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 70:1895-1899, 1993.
3. G. Brassard, R. Cleve, and A. Tapp. Cost of exactly simulating quantum entanglement with classical communication. Physical Review letters, 83(9):1874-1787, 1999. quant-ph/9901035.
4. B. Brezger, L. Hackermiiler, S. Uttenhalter, J. Petachinka, and A. Zeilinger. Matter-wave interferometer for large molecules, quantph/0202158, 2002.
5. D. Bouwmeester, J-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature, 390:575-579, 1997.
6. S. Bandyopadhyay and V. Roychowdhury. Supercatalysis. quantph/0107103, 2001.
7. D. Brufi. Characterizing entanglement, quant-ph/0110078, 2001.
8. Ch. H. Bennett, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and A. V. Thapliyal. Entanglement-assisted classical capacity of noisy quantum channels. quant-ph/9904023, 1999.
9. W. Dür. Multipartite bound entangled states that do not violate Bell's inequality, quant-ph/0107050, 2001.
10. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, quant-ph/0005115, 2000.
11. K. Dennison and W. K. Wootters. Entanglement sharing among qudits. quant-ph/0106058, 2001.
12. A Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen. Can quantum mechanical description of physics reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47:777-780, 1935.
13. H. Fan, K. Matsumoto, and H. Imai. Quantifying entanglement by concurrence hierarchy, quant-ph/0204041, 2002.
14. Ch. A. Puchs. Quantum mechanics as quantum information, qp/0205039, 2002.
15. D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang. Quantum teleportation is a universal computational primitive, quant-ph/9908010, 1999.
16. J. Gruska and H. Imai. Puzzles, mysteries and power of quantum entanglement. In Proceedings of MCU'01, Cisenau, LNCS 2055, pages 25-69, 2001.
17. L. K. Grover Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Physical Review Letters, 78:325-328, 1997.
18. J. Gruska. Mathematics unlimited, 2001 and beyond, chapter Quantum computing challenges, pages 529-564. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
19. J. Gruska. Quantum computing. McGraw-Hill, 1999-2002. See also additions and updatings of the book on http://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/gruska.
20. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki. Bound entanglement can be activated, quant-ph/9806058, 1998.
21. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki. Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: is there a bound entanglement in nature? quant-ph/9801069, 1998.
22. M. Hayashi and K. Matsumoto. Variable length universal entanglement concentration by local operations and its application to teleportation and dense coding, quant-ph/0109028, 2001.
23. B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E. S. Polzik. Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects, quant-ph/0106057, 2001.
24. R. Jozsa and N. Linden. On the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up. quant-ph/0201143, 2002.
25. D. Jonathan and M. B. Plenio. Entanglement-assisted local manipulation of pure quantum states, quant-ph/9905071, 1999.
26. Kent. Causal quantum theory and the collapse locality loophole. quant-ph/0204104, 2002.
27. D. Kaszilowski, M. Zukowski, and P. Gnacinski. Bound entanglement and local realism. Physical Review A, 65:032107, 2002.
28. V. M. Kendom, K. Zyckowski, and W. J. Munro. Bounds on entanglement in qudit systems, quant-ph/0203037, 2002.
29. D. W. Leung. Quantum Vernam cipher, quant-ph/0012077, 2000.
30. T. W. Marshall. Nonlocality-the party may be over, quant-ph/0203042, 2002.
31. K Matsumoto, T. Shimono, and A. Winter. Additivity of the Holevo channel capacity and of the entanglement of formation. In preparation, 2002.
32. M. Murao and V. Vedral. Remote information concentration using a bound entangled state, quant-ph/0008078, 2000.
33. R. Raz. Exponential separation of quantum and classical communication complexity. In Proceedings of 31st ACM STOC, pages 358-367, 1999.
34. Razborov. Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates, quant-ph/0204025, 2002.
35. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel. Quantum computing with measurement only, quant-ph/0010033, 2000.
36. Schrodinger. Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quanenmechanik. Natürwissenschaften, 23:807-812, 823-828, 844-849, 1935.
37. P. W. Shor. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In Proceedings of 37th IEEE FOCS, pages 56-65, 1996.
38. P. W. Shor Polynomial time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on quantum computer. SI AM J. on Computing, 26(5):1484-1509, 1997.
39. Smolin. A four-party unlockable bound-entangled state, quant-ph/0001001, 2000.
40. P. W. Shor, J. Smolin, and A. Thapliyal. Superactivation of bound entanglement, quant-ph/0005117, 2000.
41. Guifré Vidal and J. I. Cirac. When only two thirds of the entanglement can be distilled, quant-ph/0107051, 2001.
42. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschede. Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways, quant-ph/0109033, 2001.
43. F. Verstraete and M. M. Wolf. Entanglement versus Bell violations under local filtering operations, quant-ph/0112012, 2001.
44. R. F. Werner. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Review A, 40:4277-4281, 1989.
45. R. F. Werner. All teleportation and dense coding schemes, quantph/0003070, 2000.
46. K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sampera, and M. Lewenstein. On the volume of mixed entangled states, quant-ph/9804024, 1998.