Predicting marital satisfaction from ideal and actual maternal roles

Psychological Reports

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 99-106

  Bollman, Stephan R ^c   Schumm, Walter R ^b   Jurich, Anthony P ^c   Yoon, Gyung Ja ^a  

^a Dong Eui University   (South Korea)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141428124     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.1.99     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALTROCCHI, J., & CROSBY, R. D. (1989) Clarifying and measuring the concept of traditional vs. egalitarian roles in marriage. Sex Roles, 20, 639-648.
2. ARNOTT, C. C. (1972) Husbands' attitude and wives' commitment to employment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 673-684.
3. BARNETT, R. C., & BARUCH, G. K. (1987) Social roles, gender, and psychological distress. In R. C. Barnett, L. Biener, & E. K. Baruch (Eds.), Gender and stress. New York: Free Press. Pp. 122-143.
4. BOWEN, G. L., & ORTHNER, D. K. (1983) Sex-role congruency and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 223-230.
5. CRANE, D. R., NEWFIELD, N., & ARMSTRONG, D. (1984) Predicting divorce at marital therapy intake: wives' distress and the Marital Status Inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10, 305-312.
6. CRONBACH, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7. CROSSMAN, R. K., STITH, S. M., & BENDER, M. M. (1990) Sex role egalitarianism and marital violence. Sex Roles, 22, 293-304.
8. EDMONDS, V. H. (1967) Marital conventionalization: definition and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 681-688.
9. GRIMMELL, D., & STERN, G. S. (1992) The relationship between gender role ideals and psychological well-being. Sex Roles, 27, 487-497.
10. GUBRIUM, J. F., & HOLSTEIN, J. A. (1993) Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and family discourse. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a sourcebook. New York: Plenum. Pp. 651-672.
11. JEONG, G. J., BOLLMAN, S. R., & SCHUMM, W. R. (1992) Self-reported marital instability as correlated with the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale for a sample of Midwestern wives. Psychological Reports, 70, 243-246.
12. KIBRIA, N., BARNETT, R. C., BARUCH, G. K., MARSHALL, N. L., & PLECK, J. H. (1990) Homemaking-role quality and the psychological well-being and distress of employed women. Sex Roles, 22, 327-347.
13. LAMKE, L. K. (1989) Marital adjustment among rural couples: the role of expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 579-590.
14. LAROSSA, R., & REITZES, D. C. (1993) Symbolic Interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a sourcebook. New York: Plenum. Pp. 135-163.
15. LI, J. T., & CALDWELL, R. A. (1987) Magnitude and directional effects of marital sex-role incongruence on marital adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 97-110.
16. MURSTEIN, B. I., & WILLIAMS, P. (1983) Sex roles and marital adjustment. Small Group Behavior, 14, 77-93.
17. OSMOND, M. W., & THORNE, B. (1993) Feminist theories: the social construction of gender in families and society. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a sourcebook. New York: Plenum. Pp. 591-623.
18. PETERSON, C. D., BAUCOM, D. H., ELLIOTT, M. J., & FARR, P. A. (1989) The relationship between sex role identity and marital adjustment. Sex Roles, 21, 775-787.
19. SABATELLI, R. M. (1988) Measurement issues in marital research: a review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891-915.
20. SCANZONI, J., & FOX, G. L. (1980) Sex roles, family, and society: the seventies and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 743-756.
21. SCANZONI, J., & SZINOVACZ, M. (1980) Family decision making: a developmental sex role model. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. SCHUMM, W. R., BOLLMAN, S. R., & JURICH, A. P. (1981) The dimensionality of an abbreviated version of the Relationship Inventory: an urban replication with married couples. Psychological Reports, 48, 51-56.
23. SCHUMM, W. R., JURICH, A. P., & BOLLMAN, S. R. (1980) Dimensionality of an abbreviated Relationship Inventory for couples. Journal of Psychology, 105, 225-230.
24. SCHUMM, W. R., JURICH, A. P., BOLLMAN, S. R., & BUGAIGHIS, M. A. (1985) His and her marriage revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 221-227.
25. SCHUMM, W. R., MILLIKEN, G. H., JURICH, A. P., BOLLMAN, S. R., JEONG, G. J., & HAWKINSON, D. P. (1990) Mobility effect models: a comment on Glenn, McRae, and Brody. Social Forces, 69, 617-620.
26. SCHUMM, W. R., PAFF-BERGEN, L. A., HATCH, R. C., OBIORAH, F. C., COPELAND, J. M., MEENS, L. D., & BUGAIGHIS, M. A. (1986) Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381-387.
27. SPANIER, G. B. (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
28. TOULIATOS, J., PERLMUTTER, B. F., & STRAUS, M. A. (1990) Handbook of family measurement techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. WANOUS, J. P., & REICHERS, A. E. (1996) Estimating the reliability of a single-item measure. Psychological Reports, 78, 631-634.
30. WEIGEL, D. J., & WEIGEL, R. R. (1990) Congruency of preferences for family-based gender roles and family satisfaction in two-generation farm families. Sex Roles, 22, 649-659.
31. WEISS, R. L., & CERRETO, M. C. (1980) The Marital Status Inventory: development of a measure of dissolution potential. American Journal of Family Therapy, 8, 80-85.
32. WHITE, M. B., STAHMANN, R. F., & FURROW, J. L. (1994) Shorter may be better: a comparison of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test. Family Perspective, 28(1), 53-66.