Quadratic RSM models of processing parameters for three-layer oriented flakeboards

Wood and Fiber Science

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 173-186

  Wang, Kaiyuan ^a   Lam, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Density; Flake orientation; Optimization; Oriented strandboard; Response surface method; Slenderness ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043287551     PISSN: 07356161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Society for Testing and Materials. (ASTM). 1994. D-1037-93 Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials. Philadelphia, PA.
2. Au, K. C., R. O. Gertijejansen, and K. Larntz. 1992. Use of response surface methodology to maximize paper birch utilization in a three-layer, two-species oriented strandboard. Wood Fiber Sci. 24(4):432-441.
3. Canadian Standards of Association. 1994. Standards on OSB and waferboard. CAN/CSA-0437.0-93.
4. Canadido, L. S., F. Saito, and S. Suzuki. 1988. Effect of particle shape on the orthotropic properties of oriented strand board. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 34(1):21-27.
5. _, _, and _. 1990. Influence of strand thickness and board density on the orthotropic properties of oriented strandboard. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 36(8): 632-636.
6. Chen, L. Z., H. Zhang, Q. Wu, and J. Wu. 1981. Application of optimization design in mechanical engineering. Shanghai Sci. and Technol. Publishing Company. Shanghai, China. 293 pp.
7. Doyle, M., M. Sander, S. Shepard, and J. Yavorsky. 1996. Quadratic models for predicting performance of high quality OSB. Pages 55-63 in Proc. Third Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium. Kyoto, Japan.
8. Ethington, R. L. 1978. Structural flakeboard from forest residues. Gen. Tech. Rep. Wo-5. Edit. USDA Forest Serv., Washington, D.C. 241 pp.
9. Geimer, R. L. 1982. Dimensional stability of flakeboards as affected by board specific gravity and flake alignment. Forest Prod. J. 32(8):44-52.
10. _, H. M. Montrey, and W. F. Lehmann. 1975. Effects of layer characteristics on the properties of three-layer particleboards. Forest Prod. J. 25(3):19-29.
11. Hsu, W. E. 1996. Optimization of pressing parameters for waferboard/OSB panels. Canadian Forest Service. No. 19. Forintek Canada Corporation. 27 pp.
12. _, and S. Kirincic. 1996. Advancement in OSB manufacturing technology. Pages 46-54 in Proc. Third Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium. Kyoto, Japan.
13. Kelly, M. 1977. Critical review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. General Technical Report FPL-10. USDA Forest Products Lab, Madison, WI. 65 pp.
14. Khuri, A. I., and J. A. Cornell. 1996. Response surfaces: Designs and analyses. Marcel Dekker. New York, NY. 510 pp.
15. Kuester, J. L., and J. H. Mize. 1973. Optimization techniques with Fortran. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, NY. 500 pp.
16. Lau, P. W. 1981. Numerical approach to predict the modulus of elasticity of oriented waferboard. Wood Sci. 14(2):73-85.
17. Lehmann, W. F. 1974. Properties of structural particleboards. Forest Prod. J. 24(1):19-26.
18. Lu, C., P. R. Steiner, and F. Lam. 1998. Simulation study of wood-flake composite mat structures. Forest Prod. J. 48(5):89-93.
19. Mao, S. 1981. Regression analysis and experiment design. Huadong Normal University. Shanghai, China. 375 pp.
20. McNatt, J. D., L. Bach, and R. W. Wellwood. 1992. Contribution of flake alignment to performance of strandboard. Forest Prod. J. 42(3):45-50.
21. Moslemi, A. A. 1974. Particleboard. Vol. I: Materials. Southern Illinois University Press. Carbonale and Edwardsville, IL. 244 pp.
22. Wang, K., and F. Lam. 1998. Robot-based research on three-layer oriented flakeboards. Wood Fiber Sci. 30(4)339-347.
23. Warren, W. G., and J. R. T. Hailey. 1980. Using response-surface methodology to evaluate veneer yield and quality. Wood Science 12(3):132-140.