Geology, archaeology, and 'the raging vortex of the "eolith" controversy'

Proceedings of the Geologists' Association

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 255-262

  O'Connor, Anne ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; ARTIFACT; GEOLOGY; PALEOLITHIC; TOOL USE;

CINDERELLA;

EID: 0043286750     PISSN: 00167878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7878(03)80018-4     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anon. 1914. Summary of a meeting at the Geological Society, 1914. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London. 70, ii xii.
2. Boule, M. 1905. L'Origine des Eolithes. l'Anthropologie. 16, 257 267.
3. Breuil, H. 1910. Sur la Présence d'Éoliths a la Base de l'Éocène Parisien. l'Anthropologie, 21, 385 408.
4. Commont, V. 1908. Les Industries de l'Ancien Saint-Acheul. L'Anthropologie, 19, 527 572.
5. Dawkins, W.B. 1910. The Arrival of Man in Britain in the Pleistocene Age. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 40, 233 263.
6. Desnoyers, J. 1863. Note sur des indices materiels de la coexistence de l'homme avec l'Elephas meridionalis dans un terrain des environs de Chartres, plus anciens que les terrains de transport quaternaires des vallées de la Somme et de la Seine. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires de l'Académie des Sciences, 56, 1073 1083.
7. Evans, J. 1872. The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain. Longmans. Green, Reader, and Dyer, London.
8. Evans, J. 1877/78. Presidential Address to 'the meeting on the present state of the Question of the Antiquity of Man'. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 7, 149 151.
9. Grayson, D.K. 1986. Eoliths, Archaeological Ambiguity, and the Generation of 'Middle-Range' Research. In (Meltzer, D.J., Fowler, D.D. & Sabloff, J.A.; eds) American Archaelogy: Past and Future. A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology. Smithsonian Institution Press, 77 133.
10. Harrison, E.R. 1928. Harrison of Ightham. Oxford University Press, London.
11. Haward, F.N. 1914. The Problem of the Eoliths. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 1(4), 347 360.
12. Haward, F.N. 1919. The Origin of the 'Rostro-carinate Implements' and Other Chipped Flints from the Basement Beds of East Anglia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 3(l), 118 146.
13. Kendall, H.G.O. 1921. Eoliths Their Origin and Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 3(3), 333 352.
14. Lankester, E.R. 1912a. Past and Present Man. The Saturday Review, 113(2942), 332 334.
15. Lankester, E.R. 1912b. The Sub-Crag Flint Implements. Nature, 90(2244), 249 250.
16. Lankester, E.R. 1912c. On the Discovery of a Novel Type of Flint Implement below the Base of the Red Crag of Suffolk. Proving the Existence of Skilled Workers of Flint in the Pliocene Age. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Seríes B 202, 283 336.
17. Lankester, E.R. 1914. Description of the Test Specimen of the Rostro-Carinate Industry found beneath the Norwich Crag. Occasional Papers of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4.
18. Levine, P. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional Antiquarians, Historians and Archaeologists in Victorian England 1838 1886. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Lubbock, J. 1862. On the Evidence of the Antiquity of Man, afforded by the Physical Structure of the Somme Valley. Natural History Review, 2, 244 269.
20. Lubbock, J. 1865. Pre-Historic Times as illustrated by Ancient Remains and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. Williams and Norgate, London.
21. Lubbock, J. 1869. Pre-Historic Times as illustrated by Ancient Remains and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages (2nd edn). Williams and Norgate, London.
22. Moir, J.R. 1911. The Flint Implements of Sub-Crag Man. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia. 1 (1), 17 24.
23. Moir, J.R. 1912. The Natural Fracture of Flint and its Bearing upon Rudimentary Flint Implements. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 1(2), 171 185.
24. Moir, J.R. 1913. A Defence of the 'Humanity' of the Pre-River Valley Implements of the Ipswich District. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Socieiy of East Anglia, 1(3), 368 374.
25. Moir, J.R. 1920. The Transition from Rostro-carinate Flint Implements to the Tongue-shaped Implements of River-terrace Gravels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 209, 329 350.
26. Mortillet, G. de 1873. Classification des diverses périodes de l'âge de la Pierre. Compte Rendu du Congrès International D'Anthropologie & D'Archéologie Préhistoriques, ome Session, Bruxelles, 1872. Weissenbruch, Bruxelles.
27. Mortillet, G. de 1883. Le Préhistorique Antiquaté de I'Hon me C. Reinwald, Paris.
28. Newton, E.T. 1898. The Evidence for the Existence of Man in the Tertiary Period. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 15, 63 82.
29. Prestwich, G. 1899. Life and Letters of Sir Joseph Prestwich William Blackwood and Sons, London.
30. Prestwich, J. 1860. On the Occurrence of Flint-implements, associated with the Remains of Animals of Extinct Species in Beds of a late Geological Period, in France at Amiens and Abbeville, and in England at Hoxne. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 150, 277 318.
31. Prestwich, J. 1889. On the occurrence of Palaeolithic Flint Implements in the Neighbourhood of Ightham, Kent; their Distribution and Probable Age. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 45, 270 297.
32. Prestwich, J. 1891. On the Age, Formation, and Successive Drift Stages of the Valley of the Darent; with Remarks on the Palaeolithic Implements of the District, and on the Origin of its Chalk Escarpment. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 47, 126 163.
33. Prestwich, J. 1892. On the Primitive Characters of the Flint Implements of the Chalk Plateau of Kent, with reference to the Question of their Glacial or Pre-Glacial Age. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(3), 246 262.
34. Riper, A. Bowdoin Van 1993. Men among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Antiquity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
35. Roe, D. 1981. Amateurs and Archaeologists: Some Early Contributions to British Palaeolithic Studies. In (Evans, J.D., Cunliffe, B. & Renfrew, C.; eds) Antiquity and Man. Essays in Honour of Glyn Daniel. Thames and Hudson, London, 214 220.
36. Rutot, A. 1900. Sur la distribution des industries paléolithiques dans les couches quaternaires de la Belgique. l'Anthropologie, 11, 707 746.
37. Sackett, J.R. 1981. From de Mortillet to Bordes: a century of French Palaeolithic research. In (Daniel, G.; ed.) Towards a History of Archaeology. Thames and Hudson, London, 85 99.
38. Sackett, J.R. 1991. Straight Archaeology French Style: The Phylogenetic Paradigm in Historic Perspective. In (Clark, G.A.; ed.) Perspectives on the Past. Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean hunter gatherer research. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 109 139.
39. Sollas, W. 1911. Ancient Hunters and their Modern Representatives. Macmillan and Co., London.
40. Spencer, F. 1988. Prologue to a Scientific Forgery: The British Eolithic Movement from Abbeville to Piltdown. In (Stocking, G.W.; ed.) Bones, Bodies, Behavior, Essays on Biological Anthropolgy. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin, 84 116.
41. Spencer, F. 1990. Piltdown. A Scientific Forgery. Natural History Museum Publications, London.
42. Warren, S.H. 1905. On the Origin of 'Eolithic' Flints by Natural Causes, especially by the Foundering of Drifts. Man, 5, 337 364.
43. Warren, S.H. 1913. Problems of Flint Fracture. Man. 13(20), 37 38.
44. Warren, S.H. 1914a. Some Points in the Eolithic Controversy. The Geological Magazine Decade VI. I, 546 552.
45. Warren, S.H. 1914b. The Experimental Investigation ol Flint Fracture and its Application to Problems of Human Implements. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 44,412 450.
46. Warren, S.H. 1940. Geological and Prehistoric Traps. Essex Naturalist, 27, 2 19.