The Changing Nature of Pay Systems and the Need for New Midrange Theories of Pay

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 245-247

  Heneman, Robert L ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043284814     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00027-9     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Gerhart B., Trevor C.D., Graham M.E. New directions in compensation research: Synergies, risk, and survival. Ferris G.R. Research in personnel and human resources. vol. 14:1996;143-203.
2. Heneman R.L., Ledford G.E. Jr., Gresham M.T. The changing nature of work and its effects on compensation design and delivery. Rynes S., Gerhart B. Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. 2000;195-240 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
3. Jenkins G.B., Mitra A., Gupta N., Shaw J.B. Are financial rewards related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83:1998;777-787.
4. Klimoski R. Theory presentation in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review. 1:1991;253-271.
5. Lawler E.E. III, Mohrman S.A., Ledford G.E. Jr. Strategies for high performance organizations. 1998;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
6. McAdams J.L., Hawk E.J. Organizational performance and rewards. 1994;American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.
7. Mitchell D.J.B., Lewin D., Lawler E.E. III Alternative pay systems, firm performance, and productivity. Blinder A.S. A.S. productivity. Paying for productivity. 1990;Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
8. Petty M.M., Singleton B., Connell D.W. An experimental evaluation of an incentive plan in the electric utility industry. Journal of Applied Psychology. 77:1992;427-436.