The acceptability of the use of sedationin the management of dental anxiety in children: Views of dental students

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 72-76

  Newton, J T ^a   Naidu, R ^b   Sturmey, P ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES   (Trinidad and Tobago)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Behaviour management; Dental students; Sedation; Social validation; Treatment acceptability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DENTAL ANXIETY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELAXATION TRAINING; REWARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DENTAL ANXIETY; DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RELAXATION TECHNIQUES; REWARD; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0043236172     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00301.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Department of Health. Our healthier nation - a contract for health. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.
2. Department of Health. Modernising mental health services. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
3. Hanley B. Involvement works: the second report of the standing group on consumers in NHS research. London: Department of Health, 1999.
4. Hanley B. Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS. Briefing notes for researchers. London: Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit, 2000.
5. Newton T. Involving the 'consumer' in the evaluation of dental care: a philosophy in search of data. Br Dental J 2001: 192: 650-653.
6. Brandes DA, Wilson S, Preisch JW, Casamassimos PS. A comparison of opinions from parents of disabled and non-disabled children on behaviour management techniques used in dentistry. Spec Care Dent 1995: 15: 119-123.
7. Havelka C, McTigue S, Wilson S, Odom J. The influence of social status and prior explanation on parental attitudes toward behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent 1992: 14: 376-381.
8. Scott S, Garcia-Goody F. Attitudes of hispanic parents toward behavior management techniques. ASDC J Dent Child 1998: 65: 128-131.
9. Murphy MG, Fields HW, Machen JB. Parental acceptance of pediatric dentistry behavior management techniques. Pediatr Dent 1984: 6: 193-198.
10. Fields HW, Machen JB, Murphy MG. Acceptability of various behavior management techniques relative to types of dental treatment. Pediatr Dent 1984: 6: 199-203.
11. Nathan JE. Management of the difficult child: a survey of pediatric dentists' use of restraint sedation and general anaesthesia. ASDC J Dent Child 1989: 56: 293-301.
12. Acs G, Hersch G, Testen RD, Ng MW. A 20-year perspective on the changing use of hand-over-mouth (HOM) and restraint in post-doctoral pediatric education. Pediatr Dent 2001: 23: 301-306.
13. General Dental Council. Maintaining standards. London: GDC, 2001.
14. Kazdin AE. Acceptability of aversive procedures and medication as treatment alternatives for child deviant behavior. J Abnorm Psychol 1984: 12: 289-301.
15. Kazdin AE, French NH, Sherick RB. Acceptability of alternative treatments for children: evaluation by inpatient children, parents and staff. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981: 49: 900-907.
16. Morgan RL. Judgements of restrictiveness, social acceptability and usage: review of research on procedures to decrease behaviour. Am J Ment Retard 1989: 101: 121-133.
17. McDonnell AJ, Dearden R, Sturmey P. The acceptability of physical restraint procedures for people with learning disabilities. Behav Cogn Psychother 1993: 21: 255-264.
18. McDonnell A, Sturmey P. The social validation of physical restraint procedures with people with developmental disabilities: a comparison of young people and professional groups. Res Dev Disabil 2000: 21: 85-92.
19. Newton T, Hartley P, Sturmey P. Treatment evaluation for eating disorders by clients with eating disorders. Behav Cogn Psychother 1993: 21: 371-374.
20. Sturmey P. Treatment acceptability for anorexia nervosa: effect of treatment type, problem severity and treatment outcome. Behav Psychother 1992: 20: 91-93.
21. Sokel RR, Rolf FJ. Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1981.
22. SPSS 10. Applications guide. Illinois: SPSS Inc, 1999.