Applying planning models to study new competition: Analysis for the Bonneville Power administration

Energy Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 273-280

  Neubauer, Franklin ^a   Westman, Erik ^b   Ford, Andrew ^c  

^a FNT Consulting   (United States)

^b BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deregulation; Electric power planning; Simulation applications

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043226713     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(96)00139-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Association of Demand-Side Management Professionals (1992) Utility Planning Software: A Compendium Association of Energy Services Professionals, Boca Raton, FL
2. Backus, G (1989) Testimony in Behalf of Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources Docket 89-152' in The Illinois Statewide Electric Utility Plan Recommendations Illinois Commerce Commission, Springfield, Il
3. Backus, G and Amlin, J (1990) Introduction to the Energy 2020 Model Systematic Solutions, Vandalia, OH
4. Bonneville Power Administration (1981) Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act With Index Report DOE/BP-67
5. Bonneville Power Administration (1991) Draft 1992 Resource Program Technical Report Report DOE/BP-1727
6. Bonneville Power Administration (1994) Business Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Report DOE/BP-2396
7. Bunn, D W, Larsen, E R and Vlahos, K (1993) Complementary modeling approaches for analysing several effects of privatization on electricity investment, J. Opl Res. Soc. 44(10), 957-971.
8. Ford, A (1990) Estimating the impact of efficiency standards on the uncertainty of the Northwest electric system. Ops Res. 37(4), 580-597.
9. Ford, A (1995) "The Changing Role of Simulation Models: The Case of the Pacific Northwest Electric System" in Bunn, D W and Larsen, E R (eds) Systems Modeling for Energy Policy (forthcoming) Wiley, New York
10. Ford, A, Bull, M and Naill, R (1987) Bonneville's Conservation Policy Analysis Models. Energy Policy 15(2), 109-124.
11. Ford, A and Naill, R (1985) Conservation Policy in the Pacific Northwest Report to the Bonneville Power Administration DOE/BP-12761-1
12. Geinzer, J, Wood, F and Ford, A (1990) Dynamic Analysis of Pacific Northwest Non-Utility Power Generation Final Report to the Bonneville Power Administration DOE/BP-37521-1
13. Geinzer, J, Cranna, M and Ford, A (1992) 1991 Scenario Analysis for the Pacific Northwest Electric System Final Report to the Bonneville Power Administration
14. Goldman, C, Hirst, E and Krause, F (eds) (1989) Least-Cost Planning in the Utility Sector Progress and Challenges Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-27130
15. Howarth, R, Schipper, L and Andersson, B (1993) The structure and intensity of energy use: trends in five OECD nations. Energy J. 14(2), 27-45.
16. Owens, J (1979) Gruppen for Ressursstudier Report GRS 208: Electricity and Norway's Power Intensive Industry: A Statistical Portrait Sagveien 21, Oslow 4, Norway
17. Peck, M (ed.) (1988) The World Aluminum Industry in a Changing Era Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
18. TechPlan Associates (1989) Assessment of Commercial and Industrial Cogeneration Potential in the Pacific Northwest Report to the Bonneville Power Administration DOE/BP-40040-2
19. Westman, E and Neubauer, F (1993) Resource Policy Screening: BPA Competitiveness and Non-Utility Generation Internal Bonneville Power Administration Report