Some consequences of attract F

Lingua

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 81-107

  Ochi, Masao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Attract; CED; Coordination; Cyclicity; Derivational constraints; Generalized pied piping; Japanese; Locality; Relativized minimality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043207869     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(99)00012-1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agbayani, B., to appear. Generalized pied-piping and island effects. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 28, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2. Baker, C.L., 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6, 197-219.
3. Barss, A., 1986. Chains and anaphoric dependence: On reconstruction and its implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
4. Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi, 1991. Notes on psych-verbs, θ-theory, and binding. In: R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 132-162. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bošković, Ž., 1997. The syntax of non-finite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bošković, Ž., to appear. Sometimes in SpecCP, sometimes in-situ. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bošković, Ž. and H. Lasnik, to appear. How strict is the cycle? Linguistic Inquiry.
8. Bošković, Ž. and D. Takahashi, 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 347-366.
9. Chomsky, N., 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Chomsky, N. 1986b. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
11. Chomsky, N., 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In: R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417-454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N., 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Chomsky, N., 1994. Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5, MITWPL.
14. Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik, 1993. Principles and parameters theory. In: J. Jacob, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: de Grutyer.
16. Collins, C., 1994. Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45-62.
17. Davidson, D., 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In: N. Rescher (ed.), The logic of decision and action, 81-95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
18. Epstein, S., E. Groat, R. Kawashima, and H. Kitahara, 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Freidin, R., 1986. Fundamental issues in the theory of binding. In: B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, 151-188. Dordrecht; Reidel.
20. Fukui, N., 1995. Theory of projection in syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
21. Fukui, N. and M. Speas, 1986. Specifiers and projections. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 128-172. MITWPL.
22. Higginbotham, J., 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547-594.
23. Huang, C.-T.J., 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
24. Ishii, T., 1997. An asymmetry in the computation of phrase structure and its consequences. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
25. Kayne, R., 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
26. Kayne, R., 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Kuno, S., 1997. Binding theory in the minimalist program. Unpublished ms., Harvard University.
28. Kuroda, S.-Y., 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In: W. Poser (ed.), Papers from the second international workshop on Japanese syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
29. Lasnik, H., 1995. Last Resort and Attract F. In: L. Gabriele, D. Hardison and R. Westmoreland (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth annual meetings of the formal linguistics society of mid-America, 62-81. Indiana University.
30. Lasnik, H., 1998. Some reconstruction riddles. A talk given at 22nd Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
31. Lasnik, H. and M. Saito, 1992. Move α. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Lebeaux, D., 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
33. Maki, H., 1995. The syntax of particles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
34. Maki, H. and M. Ochi, to appear. Scrambling of wh-phrases and the Move-F hypothesis. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
35. Munn, A., 1987. Coordinate structure and X-bar theory. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1), 121-140.
36. Munn, A., 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
37. Murasugi, K. and M. Saito, 1994. Adjunction and cyclicity. Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 302-317. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
38. Nishigauchi, T., 1986. Quantification in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
39. Nunes, J., 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the minimalist program. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
40. Postal, P., 1997. Strong crossover violations and binding principles. A talk given at the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 1997, Yale University.
41. Progovac, L., 1998. 'Avoid conjunction', adjunction, and the 'coordination of likes constraint'. In: Ž. Bošković, S. Franks and W. Snyder (eds.), Annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Connecticut meeting 1997, 252-266. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
42. Reinhart, T., 1995. Interface strategies. OTS Working Paper, Utrecht University.
43. Rizzi, L., 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Ross, J.R., 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
45. Saito, M., 1989. Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'-movement. In: M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 182-200. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Saito, M. and N. Fukui, 1998. Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 439-474.
47. Sobin, N., 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 318-344.
48. Stowell, T., 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
49. Takahashi, D., 1994. Minimality of movement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
50. Takahashi, D., 1997. Move F and null operator movement. The Linguistic Review 14, 181-196.
51. Takano, Y., 1994. Scrambling, relativized minimality and economy of derivation. Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 385-399. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
52. Tsai, W.-T.D., 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
53. Watanabe, A., 1992. Wh-in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, MITWPL.
54. Zoerner, E., 1995. Coordination: The syntax of &P. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.