Systematics of Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyceae). I. A phylogenetic analysis of the family

Phycological Research

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 83-98

  Rines, Jan E B ^a   Theriot, Edward C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacteriastrum; Chaetoceros; Cladistics; Diatoms; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DIATOM; PHYLOGENY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ATTHEYA; BACILLARIOPHYCEAE; BACILLARIOPHYTA; BACTERIASTRUM; CERATAULINA; CHAETOCEROS; CHAETOCEROTACEAE; EUCAMPIA; GONIOCEROS; HEMIAULUS; HYALOCHAETE; PHAEOCEROS;

EID: 0043205889     PISSN: 13220829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1835.2003.00297.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams, E. N. I. 1986. N-trees as nestings: complexity, similarity and consensus. J. Classif. 3: 299-317.
2. Blasco, D. 1970. Estudio de la morfología de Chaetoceros didymus at microscopio etectrónico. Invest. Pesq. 34: 149-55 (in Spanish).
3. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
4. Brunel, J. 1972. Orientation of setae in the genus Chaetoceros, in regard to the apical axis. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India 14: 315-27.
5. Carpenter, J. M. 1992. Random cladistics. Cladistics 8: 147-53.
6. Carpenter, J. M. 1996. Uninformative bootstrapping. Cladistics 1: 177-81.
7. Castracane, A. 1886. Report on the Diatomaceae collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. In Thompson, C. W. and Murray, J. (Eds) Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger. Botany, Vol. II. HMSO, London.
8. Chu, S. P. and Kuo, Y. C. 1957. Studies on the genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg from the fishing ground of the mackerel, Pneumatophorus japonicus (Houttuyn), of the Shantung coast from Chefoo to Weihai. Part I. A systematic study. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 1: 27-94.
9. Drebes, G. 1972. The life history of the centric diatom Bacteriastrum hyalinum Lauder. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 39: 95-110.
10. Drebes, G. 1974. Marines Phytoplankton. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart
11. Drebes, G. 1977. Cell structure, cell division, and sexual reproduction of Attheya decora West (Bacillariophyceae, Biddulphiineae). Beih. Nova Hedwigia 54: 167-78.
12. Ehrenberg, C. G. 1844. Zum Schlufs legte Hr. Ehrenberg der Akademie einige vorläufige Resultate seiner Untersuchungen der ihm von der Südpolreise des Capitain Rofs, so wie von den Herren Schayer und Darwin zugekommenen Materialien über das Verhalten des kleinsten Lebens in den Oceanen und den gröfsten bisher zugänglichen Tiefen des Weltmeers vor. I. Die Süd-Pol-Reise von 1841-1844. In: Bericht Über die Zur Bekanntmachung Geeingneten Verhandlungen der Königl. Preufs. Akademie der Wissenschaften Zu Berlin. Königl. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, pp. 182-207 (in German).
13. Evensen, D. L. and Hasle, G. R. 1975. The morphology of some Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) species as seen in the electron microscopes. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 53: 153-84.
14. Farris, J. S. 1973. A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 22: 250-6.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods wilt be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-10.
16. Fryxell, G. A. 1978. Chain forming diatoms: three species of Chaetoceraceae. J. Phycol. 14: 62-71.
17. Fryxell, G. A. and Medlin, L. K. 1981. Chain forming diatoms: evidence of parallel evolution in Chaetoceros. Cryptogam. Algol. 2: 3-29.
18. Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
19. Gallagher, J. C. 1988/1989. Toward a cladistic view of phytoplankton ecology. Biol. Oceanogr. 6: 279-89.
20. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G. and Rowe, T. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105-209.
21. Giuffrè, G. and Ragusa, S. 1988. The morphology of Chaetoceros rostratum Lauder (Bacillariophyceae) using light and electron microscopy. Bot. Mar. 31: 503-10.
22. Goertzen, L. R. and Theriot, E. C. 2003. Effects of taxon sampling, character weighting, and combined data on interpretation of relationships among the heterokont algae. J. Phycol. 39: 423-439.
23. Goloboff, P. 1999. NONA (NO NAME), Version 2. Goloboff, Tucumán.
24. Gran, H. H. 1897. Botanik. Prophyta: Diatomaceae, Silicoflagellata og Cilioflagellata. Den Norske Nordhavs-Expedition 1876-1878. 7: 1-36.
25. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47: 9-17.
26. Hargraves, P. E. 1968. Species Composition and Distribution of Net Plankton Diatoms in the Pacific Sector of the Antarctic Ocean. College of William and Mary, Virginia.
27. Hargraves, P. E. 1972. Studies on marine plankton diatoms I. Chaetoceros diadema (Ehr.) Gram life cycle, structural morphology and regional distribution. Phycologia 11: 247-57.
28. Hargraves, P. E. 1979. Studies on marine plankton diatoms IV. Morphology of Chaetoceros resting spores. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 64: 99-120.
29. Hasle, G. R. and Syvertsen, E. E. 1980. The diatom genus Cerataulina: morphology and taxonomy. Bacillaria 3: 79-113.
30. Heiden, H. and Kolbe, R. W. 1928. Die marinen Diatomeen der deutschen Südpolar-expedition 1901-03. In Von Drygalski, E. (Ed.) Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition VIII. Botanik. Walter de Gruyter & Company, Berlin and Leipzig.
31. Helmcke, J. G. and Krieger, W. 1961-77. Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild. I, II & VII. J. Cramer, Weinheim.
32. Hendey, N. I. 1937. The plankton diatoms of the southern seas. Discovery Report 16: 151-364.
33. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1989. The Morphology and Taxonomy of Species of the Diatom Genera Asteromphalus and Chaetoceros. University of Bristol, England, 109 plates.
34. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1991a. Chaetoceros bermejensis sp. nov., a new planktonic diatom from the Gulf of California. Bot. Mar. 34: 521-6.
35. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1991b. The morphology and taxonomy of the planktonic diatom Chaetoceros coarctatus Lauder (Bacillariophyceae). Diatom Res. 6: 281-7.
36. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1991c. Note on the morphology of Chaetoceros didymus and C. protuberans, with some considerations on their taxonomy. Diatom Res. 6: 289-97.
37. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1992. Observations on two closely related species, Chaetoceros tetrastichon and C. dadayi (Bacillariophyceae). Nord. J. Bot. 12: 365-71.
38. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1993a. Note on the morphology of two planktonic diatoms: Chaetoceros bacteriastroides and C. seychellarus, with comments on their taxonomy and distribution. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 111: 117-28.
39. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1993b. Study of the morphology and distribution of two planktonic diatoms: Chaetoceros paradoxus and Chaetoceros filiferus (Bacillariophyceae). Cryptogam. Bot. 3: 169-75.
40. Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1996. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bull. Natl Hist. Mus. Lond. (Bot.) 26: 1-73.
41. Hernández-Becerril, D. U., Meave del Castillo, M. E. and Lara Villa, M. A. 1993. Observations on Chaetoceros buceros (Bacillariophyceae), a rare tropical planktonic species collected from the Mexican Pacific. J. Phycol. 29: 811-18.
42. Hillis, D. M. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In Miyamoto, M. M. and Cracraft, J. (Eds) Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Hillis, D. M. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47: 3-8.
44. Hillis, D. M. and Bull, J. J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-92.
45. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Syst. Zool. 40: 257-70.
46. Hustedt, F. 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. Dr. L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora Von Deutschland, Österreich Schweiz 7: 1-920 (in German).
47. Ikari, J. 1921. On the formation of auxospores and resting spores of Chaetoceros teres, Cleve. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 35: 222-7.
48. Kaczmarska, I., Rushforth, S. R. and Johansen, J. R. 1985. Chaetoceros amanita Cleve-Euler (Bacillariophyceae) from Blue Lake Warm Spring, Utah, USA. Phycologia 24: 103-9.
49. Källersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G. and Bult, C. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8: 275-87.
50. Karsten, G. 1905. Das Phytoplankton Des Antarktischen Meeres Nach Dem Material der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898-1899. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
51. Karsten, G. 1907. Das Indische Phytoplankton Nach Dem Material der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898-1899. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
52. Karsten, G. 1928. Abteilung Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In Engler, A. and Prantl, K. (Eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2, Peridineae (Dinoflagellatae), Diatomeae (Bacillariophyta), Myxomycetes. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 105-345.
53. Koch, P. and Rivera, P. 1984. Contribucion al conocimiento de las diatomeas Chilenas III. el genero Chaetoceros Ehr. (subgenero Phaeoceros Gran). Gayana Bot. 41: 61-84 (in Spanish).
54. Koch, P. and Rivera, P. 1988. Taxonomia y morfologia de cinco especies de Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Subgenero Hyalochaete Gran) de las aguas costeras de Chile. Cienc. Technol. Mar. 12: 109-135 (in Spanish).
55. Lauder, H. S. 1864. Remarks on the marine Diatomaceae found at Hong Kong, with descriptions of new species. Trans. Microsc. Soc. London NS 12: 75-79, 1 plate.
56. Lewin, J. and Norris, R. E. 1970. Surf-zone diatoms of the coasts of Washington and New Zealand (Chaetoceros armatum T. West and Asterionella spp.). Phycologia 9: 143-9.
57. Li, C.-W. and Volcani, B. E. 1985. Studies on the biochemistry and fine structure of silica shell formation in diatoms IX. sequential valve formation in a centric diatom, Chaetoceros rostratum. Protoplasma 124: 30-41.
58. Mangin, L. 1908. Observations sur les Diatomées. Ann. Sci. Natl Bot. 9eme série: 177 (in French).
59. Mangin, L. 1915. Phytoplancton de I'Antarctique. In Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française (1908-10). Masson et Cie, Paris (in French).
60. Mangin, L. 1917a. Sur le Chaetoceros criophilus Castr., espèce charactèristique des mers antarctiques. C. R. Séances Acad. Sci. 164: 704-9 (in French).
61. Mangin, L. 1917b. Sur les formes arctiques faussement décrites sous le nom de Chaetoceros criophilus Castr. C. R. Séances Acad. Sci. 164: 770-4 (in French).
62. Mangin, L. 1919. Sur les Chaetoceros du groupe Peruvianus Bgtw. Bull. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. 25: 305-10; 411-14 (in French).
63. Manguin, E. 1960. Contribution à la connaissance du phytoplankton à diatomées des parages de Saint-Malo. Bull. Laboratory Mar. Dinard 46: 116-26 (in French).
64. Meunier, A. 1910. Microplankton des Mers de Barents et de Kara. C. Bulena, Bruxelles (in French).
65. Müller Melchers, F. C. 1953. New and little known diatoms from Uruguay and the south Atlantic coast. Comun. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montev. 30: 1-11, 7 plates.
66. Nixon, K. C. 1999. Winclada, Version 1.00.08. K. C. Nixon, Ithaca.
67. Norell, M. A. 1992. Taxic origin and temporal diversity: the effect of phylogeny. In Novacek, M. J. and Wheeler, Q. D. (Eds) Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia Unversity Press, New York: pp. 89-118.
68. Okuno, H. 1956. Electron-microscopical study on fine structures of diatom frustules XIV. Observation on the genus Chaetoceros. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 69: 186-92.
69. Ostenfeld, C. H. 1903. Plankton from the sea around the Færöes. In Warming, E. (Ed.) Botany of the Færöes. Nordisk Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 588-611.
70. Pickett-Heaps, J. D. 1998a. Cell division and morphogenesis of the centric diatom Chaetoceros decipiens (Bacillariophyceae) I. Living cells. J. Phycol. 34: 989-94.
71. Pickett-Heaps, J. D. 1998b. Cell division and morphogenesis of the centric diatom Chaetoceros decipiens (Bacillariophyceae) II. Electron microscopy and a new paradigm for tip growth. J. Phycol. 34: 995-1004.
72. Pickett-Heaps, J. D., Carpenter, J. and Koutoulis, A. 1994. Valve and seta (spine) morphogenesis in the centric diatom Chaetoceros peruvianus Brightwell. Protoplasma 181: 269-82.
73. Rines J. E. B. 1994. Systematics of selected species of the marine diatom genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg 1844. Oceanography. PhD thesis. University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island.
74. Rines J. E. B. 1999. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros contortus Schütt 1895, with preliminary observations on Chaetoceros compressus Lauder 1864 (subgenus Hyalochaete, section Compressa). Bot. Mar. 42: 539-51.
75. Rines, J. E. B. and Boonruang, P. 1995. Observations on the marine diatom Chaetoceros nipponica Ikari. In Kociolek, J. P. Sullivan, M. J. (Eds) A Century of Diatom Research in North America: a Tribute to the Distinguished Careers of Charles W. Reimer and Ruth Patrick. Koeltz Scientific Books, Champaign, pp. 21-28.
76. Rines, J. and Boonruang, P. Observations on Chaetoceros tortissimus Gran, from the Andaman Sea. In Proceedings of the 17th International Diatom Symposium 25-31 August 2002, Otawa.
77. Rines, J., Boonruang, P. and Theriot, E. 2000. Chaetoceros phuketensis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae): a new species from the Andaman Sea. Phycol. Res. 48: 161-8.
78. Rines, J. E. B. and Hargraves, P. E. 1986. Considerations of the taxonomy and biogeography of Chaetoceros ceratosporus Ostf. & Chaetoceros rigidus Ostf. In Ricard, M. (Ed.) Proceedings Of the 8th Diatom Symposium. O. Koeltz, Koenigstein, pp. 97-112.
79. Rines, J. E. B. and Hargraves, P. E. 1988. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U.S.A. Bibl. Phycol. 79: 1-196.
80. Rines, J. E. B. and Hargraves, P. E. 1990. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros compressus var. hirtisetus var. nova, with preliminary consideration of closely related taxa. Diatom Res. 5: 113-27.
81. Rines, J. E. B. and Hargraves, P. E. 1993. An investigation of the morphology, taxonomy and life history of Chaetoceros crucifer Gran (Bacillariophyceae). Beih. Nova Hedwigia 106: 169-83.
82. Ross, R., Sims, P. A. and Hasle, G. R. 1977. Observations on some species of the Hemiauloidea. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 54: 179-213.
83. Round, F. E., Crawford, R. M. and Mann, D. G. 1990. The Diatoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
84. Sanderson, M. J. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Syst. Biol. 44: 299-320.
85. Sanderson, M. J. and Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-95.
86. Shadbolt, G. 1854. A short description of some new forms of Diatomaceae from Port Natal. Trans. Microsc. Soc. London 2: 13-18.
87. Simonsen, R. 1979. The diatom system: ideas on phylogeny. Bacillaria 2: 9-71.
88. Subrahmanyan, R. 1946. On the occurrence of microspores in some centric diatoms of the Madras coast. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 25: 61-6.
89. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland.
90. Syvertsen, E. E. and Hasle, G. R. 1983. The diatom genus Eucampia: morphology and taxonomy. Bacillaria 6: 169-210.
91. Trueman, J. W. H. 1993. Randomization confounded: a response to Carpenter. Cladistics 9: 101-9.
92. von Stosch, H. A. 1982. On auxospore envelopes in diatoms. Bacillaria 5: 127-56.
93. von Stosch, H. A., Theil, G. and Kowallik, K. V. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an zentrischen Diatomeen V. Bau und Lebenszyklus von Chaetoceros didymum, mit Beobachtungen über einige andere Arten der Gattung. Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters. 25: 384-445 (in German).