Footfall patterns and interlimb co-ordination in opossums (Family Didelphidae): Evidence for the evolution of diagonal-sequence walking gaits in primates

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 260, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 423-429

  Lemelin, Pierre ^a,b   Schmitt, Daniel ^a   Cartmill, Matt ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Caluromys philander; Didelphid marsupials; Gaits; Grasping foot; Locomotion; Monodelphis domestica; Prehensility; Primates

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; LIMB; LOCOMOTION; PRIMATE; WALKING;

CALUROMYS; CALUROMYS PHILANDER; DIDELPHIDAE; MAMMALIA; METATHERIA; MONODELPHIS; MONODELPHIS DOMESTICA; PHILANDER; PRIMATES;

EID: 0043199864     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952836903003856     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cartmill, M. (1972). Arboreal adaptations and the origin of the order Primates. In The functional and evolutionary biology of primates: 3-35. Tuttle, R. H. (Ed.). Chicago: Aldine-Atheton.
2. Cartmill, M., Lemelin, P. & Schmitt, D. (2002). Support polygons and symmetrical gaits in mammals. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136: 401-420.
3. Cartmill, M., Lemelin, P. & Schmitt, D. (in press). Primate gaits and primate origins. In Primate origins and adaptations. Ravosa, M. J. & Dagosto, M. (Eds). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Charles-Dominique, P. (1983). Ecological and social adaptations in didelphid marsupials: comparison with eutherians of similar ecology. In Advances in the study of mammalian behavior: 395-422. Eisenberg, J. F. & Kleiman, D. J. (Eds). Lawrence, KS: The American Society of Mammalogists. Special Publication No 7.
5. Charles-Dominique, P., Atramentowicz, M., Charles-Dominique, M., Gérard, H., Hladik, A., Hladik, C. M. & Prévost, M. F. (1981). Les mammifères frugivores arboricoles nocturnes d'une forêt guyanaise: Inter-relations plantes-animaux. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 35: 341-435.
6. Demes, B., Larson, S. G., Stern, J. T. Jr, Jungers, W. L., Biknevicius, A. R. & Schmitt, D. (1994). The kinetics of primate quadrupedalism: 'hindlimb drive' reconsidered. J. Hum. Evol. 26: 353-374.
7. Eisenberg, J. F. (1989). Mammals of the Neotropics. The northern Neotropics: 1. Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Eisenberg, J. F. & Wilson, D. E. (1981). Relative brain size and demographic strategies in didelphid marsupials. Am. Nat. 118: 1-15.
9. Hildebrand, M. (1967). Symmetrical gaits of primates. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 26: 119-130.
10. Hildebrand, M. (1976). Analysis of tetrapod gaits: general considerations and symmetrical gaits. In Neural control of locomotion: 203-236. Herman, R. M., Grillner, S., Stein, P. S. G. & Stuart, D. C. (Eds). New York: Plenum Press.
11. Hildebrand, M. (1980). The adaptive significance of tetrapod gait selection. Am. Zool. 20: 255-267.
12. Hildebrand, M. (1985). Walking and running. In Functional vertebrate morphology: 38-57. Hildebrand, M., Bramble, D. M., Liem, K. F. & Wake, D. (Eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Hunsaker, D. II. (1977). Ecology of New World marsupials. In The biology of marsupials. 95-156. Hunsaker, D. II (Ed.). New York: Academic Press.
14. Kimura, T. (1985). Bipedal and quadrupedal walking of primates: comparative dynamics. In Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses and human bipedalism: 81-104. Kondo, S. (Ed.). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
15. Kimura, T., Okada, M. & Ishida, H. (1979). Kinesiological characteristics of primate walking: its significance in nonhuman walking. In Environment, behavior, and morphology: dynamic interactions in primates: 297-311 Morbeck, M. E., Preuschoft, H. & Gomberg, N. (Eds). New York: Gustav Fischer.
16. Larson, S. G. (1998). Unique aspects of quadrupedal locomotion in nonhuman primates. In Primate locomotion: recent advances: 157-173. Strasser, E., Fleagle, J., Rosenberger, A. & McHenry, H. (Eds). New York: Plenum Press.
17. Larson, S. G., Schmitt, D., Lemelin, P. & Hamrick, M. W. (2001). Limb excursion during quadrupedal walking: how do primates compare to other mammals? J. Zool. (Lond.) 255: 353-365.
18. Lemelin, P. (1999). Morphological correlates of substrate use in didelphid marsupials: implications for primate origins. J. Zool. (Lond.) 247: 165-175.
19. Magne de la Croix, P. (1936). The evolution of locomotion in mammals. J. Mammal. 17: 51-54.
20. Meldrum, D. J. (1991). Kinematics of the cercopithecine foot on arboreal and terrestrial substrates with implications for the interpretation of hominid terrestrial adaptations. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 84: 273-289.
21. Muybridge, E. (1887). Animals in motion [1957 reprint]. New York: Dover.
22. O'Connell, M. A. (1979). Ecology of didelphid marsupials from Northern Venezuela. In Vertebrate ecology in the northern neotropics: 73-87, Eisenberg, J. F. (Ed.). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
23. Pridmore, P. A. (1992). Trunk movements during locomotion in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae). J. Morphol. 211: 137-146.
24. Pridmore, P. A. (1994). Locomotion in Dromiciops australis (Marsupialia: Microbiotheriidae). Aust. J. Zool. 42: 679-699.
25. Prost, J. H. (1965). The methodology of gait analysis and the gaits of monkeys. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 23: 215-240.
26. Prost, J. H. (1969). A replication study on monkey gaits. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 30: 203-208.
27. Rasmussen, D. T. (1990). Primate origins: lessons from a neotropical marsupial. Am. J. Primatol. 22: 263-277.
28. Reynolds, T. R. (1985). Stresses on the limbs of quadrupedal primates. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 67: 351-362.
29. Rollinson, J. & Martin, R. D. (1981). Comparative aspects of primate locomotion with special reference to arboreal cercopithecines. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. No. 48: 377-427.
30. Schmitt, D. (1999). Compliant walking in primates. J. Zool. (Lond) 248: 149-160.
31. Schmitt, D. (2002). Gait mechanics in the common marmoset: implications for the origin of primate locomotion. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 34: 137.
32. Schmitt, D. (In press). Evolutionary implications of the unusual walking mechanics of the common marmoset (C. jacchus). Am. J. phys. Anthropol.
33. Schmitt, D. & Lemelin, P. (2002). Origins of primate locomotion: gait mechanics of the woolly opossum. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 118: 231-238.
34. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, R. J. (1995). Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman.
35. Tomita, M. (1967). A study on the movement pattern of four limbs in walking (1). Observation and discussion on the types of the movement order of four limbs seen in mammals while walking. J. anthropol. Soc. Nippon 75: 126-146.
36. Vilensky, J. A. (1989). Primate quadrupedalism: how and why does it differ from that of typical quadrupeds? Brain Behav. Evol. 34: 357-364.
37. Vilensky, J. A. & Larson S. G. (1989). Primate locomotion: utilization and control of symmetrical gaits. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 18: 17-35.
38. White, T. (1990). Gait selection in the brush-tail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), and the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana). J. Mammal. 71: 79-84.
39. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.