How is medical decision-making shared? The case of haemophilia patients and doctors: The aftermath of the infected blood affair in France

Health Expectations

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 228-241

  Fillion, Emmanuelle ^a,b  

^a CERMES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

AIDS; Clinical relationship; Decision making; Haemophilia; Prosecution; Sociology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; BLOOD BANKS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEMOPHILIA A; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INTERVIEWS; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;

EID: 0043192606     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00244.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Hermitte M-A. le Sang et le Droit. Essai sur la Transfusion sanguine. Paris: Le Seuil, 1996.
2. Carricaburu D. L'hemophilie au risque de la médecine. De la maladie individuelle à la contamination collective par le virus du sída. Paris: Anthropos, 2000.
3. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medecine, 1999; 49: 651-661.
4. Moumjid-Ferdjaoui N, Carrère M-O. La relation mé decin-patient, l'information et la participation des patients à la décision médicale: les enseignements de la littérature internationale. Revue française des affaires sociales, 2000; 2: 73-88.
5. Broclain D. (dir.). Critères de qualité des documents d'information aux patients. Prescrire, 1999; 19: 788-791.
6. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy, 1997; 2: 112-121.
7. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decision with patients: is the information good enough? British Medical Journal, 1999; 318: 318-322.
8. Godolphin W, Towle A, Mc Kendry R. Evaluation of the quality of patient information to support shared decision-making. Health Expectations, 2001; 4: 235-242.
9. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions (Cochrane Review), The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
10. Kennedy A, Sculpher M, Coulter A et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes and cost: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002; 288: 2701-2708.
11. Sculpher M, Gafni A, Watt I. Shared treatment decision making in a collectivity funded health care system: possible conflict and potential solutions. Social Science and Medecine, 2002; 54: 1369-1377.
12. Freidson E. Profession of Medecine. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
13. Baszanger I. Les maladies chroniques et leur ordre négocié. Revue française de sociologie, 1986; XXVII: 3-27.
14. Charmaz K. Experiencing chronic illness. In: Albrecht G, Fitzpatrick R, Scrinshaw S (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medecine. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
15. Conrad P. The experience of illness: recent and new directions. In: Roth J, Conrad P (eds.) Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Vol. 6, The Experience and Management of Chronic Illness. Greenwich-Connecticut: Jay Press, 1987: 1-32.
16. Strauss A, Schatzman L, Bucher B et al. The hospital and its negotiated order. In: Freidson E (ed.) The Hospital in modern society. New York: The Free Press, 1963: 147-168.
17. Armstrong D. The patient's view. Social Science and Medecine, 1984; 18: 737-744.
18. Dodier N. l'Expertise médicale, Essai de sociologie sur l'exercice du jugement. Paris: Métailié, 1993.
19. Dodier N. Expert medical décisions in occupational medecine: a sociological analysis of medical judgment. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1994; 16: 489-513.
20. Silverman D, Bloor M. Patient-centred medecine, some sociological observations on its constitution, penetration, and cultural assonance. In: Albrecht G (ed.) Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 1. Greenwich-Connecticut: Jay Press, 1990.
21. Carricaburu D. Innovation thérapeutique et acceptabilité du risque iatrogène: l'introduction des produits antihé mophiliques concentrés dans les années 70. Sciences sociales et Santé, 1999; 17: 75-98.
22. Barbot J, Dodier N. Multiplicity in scientific medecine: the experience of HIV-patients. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2002; 27: 404-440.
23. Carricaburu D, Pierret J. From biographical diruption to biographical reinforcement: the cas of HIV-positive men. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1995; 17: 65-88.
24. Chateauraynaud F, Torny D. les Sombres Précurseurs. Une sociologie pragmatique de l'alerte el du risque. Paris: Éditions de l'École des hautes études en sciences sociales, 1999.
25. Canghilhem G. le Normal et le Pathologique. Paris: PUF, 1966.
26. Hirschman A. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1970.
27. Morelle A. la Défaite de la santé publique. Paris: Flammarion, 1996.
28. Marks H. The Progress of Experiment, Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States 1900-1990. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
29. Silverman D. Communication and Medical Practice. Social Relations in the Clinic. London: Sage Publications, 1987.
30. Epstein S. Impure Science: Aids, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1996.
31. Barbot J. les Malades en mouvements. La médecine et la science à Pépreuve du sida. Paris: Balland, 2002.
32. Rabeharisoa V, Callon M. Pouvoir des malades. L'Association française contre les myopathies et la recherche. Paris: Presses de l'École des Mines, 1999.
33. Dodier N, Barbot J. Le temps des tensions épistémiques. Le développement des essais thérapeutiques dans le cadre du sida. Revue française de sociologie, 2000; 41: 79-118.