Is biased processing of strong attitudes peripheral? An extension of the dual process models of attitude change

Psychological Reports

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 589-605

  Na, Eun Yeong ^a  

^a Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043187777     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.589     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ABELSON, R. P. (1988) Conviction. American Psychologist, 43, 267-275.
2. BERLYNE, D. E. (1960) Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. BROADBENT, D. E. (1971) Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press.
4. CHAIKEN, S. (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
5. CHAIKEN, S. (1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: the Ontario Symposium. Vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 3-39.
6. CHAIKEN, S., LIBERMAN, A., & EAGLY, A. H. (1989) Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought. New York: Guilford. Pp. 212-252.
7. EAGLY, A. H., & CHAIKEN, S. (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. FORGAS, J. P. (1992) Affect in social judgments and decisions: a multiprocess model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 25. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 227-275.
9. FORGAS, J. P. (1995) Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
10. GREENWALD, A. G. (1968) Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 147-170.
11. HOUSTON, D. A., & FAZIO, R. H. (1989) Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51-66.
12. HUTTON, D. G., & BAUMEISTER, R. F. (1992) Self-awareness and attitude change: seeing oneself on the central route to persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 68-75.
13. KROSNICK, J. A., BONINGER, D. S., CHUANG, Y. C. BERENT, M. K., & CARNOT, C. G. (1993) Attitude strength: one construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.
14. LEWICKI, P. (1984) Self-schema and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1177-1190.
15. LORD, C. G., ROSS, L., & LEPPER, M. R. (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
16. MACKIE, D. M. (1986) Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
17. MACKIE, D. M., & COOPER, J. (1984) Attitude polarization: effects of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 575-585.
18. NA, E-Y. (1994) [A review of current research on attitudes and attitude change: 1985-1994.] [Korean Journal of Social Psychology], 8, 3-33. [in Korean]
19. NA, E-Y. (1998) [Toward a new paradigm including biased processing of strong attitudes: extension of the dual process model of attitude change]. [Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology], 12, 37-70. [in Korean]
20. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1981) Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
21. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1984) The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
22. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1986a) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1986b) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 19. San Diego CA: Academic Press. Pp. 123-205.
24. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1990) Involvement and persuasion: tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
25. PETTY, R. E., & KROSNICK, J. A. (Eds.) (1995) Attitude strength: antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. POMERANTZ, E. M., CHAIKEN, S., & TORDESILLAS, R. S. (1995) Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
27. PRISLIN, R. (1996) Attitude stability and attitude strength: one is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 447-477.
28. RADEN, D. (1985) Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312-330.
29. SMITH, S. M., & SHAFFER, D. R. (1991) Celerity and cajolery: rapid speech may promote or inhibit persuasion through its impact on message elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 663-669.
30. WILDER, D. A., & SIMON, A. F. (1996) Incidental and integral affect as triggers of stereotyping. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: the interpersonal context. Vol. 3, Ch. 12. New York: Guilford. Pp. 397-419.
31. WOOD, W., KALLGREN, C. A., & PREISLER, R. M. (1985) Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: the role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73-85.
32. ZUWERINK, J. R., & DEVINE, P. G. (1996) Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: it's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.