메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 265-270

U.S. ART practitioners soon to begin their forced march into a regulated future

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0043169712     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024506419990     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (4)

References (42)
  • 3
    • 0042186571 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pub. L. No. 102-493 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 263a-1 to 263a-7) (Oct. 24, 1992)
    • Pub. L. No. 102-493 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 263a-1 to 263a-7) (Oct. 24, 1992)
  • 4
    • 0041685889 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 42 U.S.C. § 263a-2(i)(1), 2003
    • 42 U.S.C. § 263a-2(i)(1), 2003
  • 5
    • 0041685879 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 42 U.S.C. § 263a-2(i)(2), 2003
    • 42 U.S.C. § 263a-2(i)(2), 2003
  • 7
    • 0041685871 scopus 로고
    • 58 Fed. Reg. 65514 or 53248 (Oct. 14) (codified at 21 C.F.R. Pt. 1270)
    • Human Tissue for Transplantation; Interim Rule, 58 Fed. Reg. 65514 or 53248 (Oct. 14, 1993) (codified at 21 C.F.R. Pt. 1270)
    • (1993) Human Tissue for Transplantation; Interim Rule
  • 9
    • 0041685875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 42 U.S.C. § 264, 2003
    • 42 U.S.C. § 264, 2003
  • 10
    • 0043188664 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 62 Fed. Reg. 9721 (March 4, 1997)
    • 62 Fed. Reg. 9721 (March 4, 1997)
  • 11
    • 0043188665 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Establishment Registration Rule (Human Cells, Tissue, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products; Establishment Registration and Listing) was published in proposed form on May 14, 1998 (63 Fed. Reg. 26744), and in final form on January 19, 2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 5447)
    • The Establishment Registration Rule (Human Cells, Tissue, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products; Establishment Registration and Listing) was published in proposed form on May 14, 1998 (63 Fed. Reg. 26744), and in final form on January 19, 2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 5447)
  • 12
    • 0041685876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Donor Suitability Rule (Suitability Determination for Donors of Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products) was published in proposed form on Sept. 30, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 52696)
    • The Donor Suitability Rule (Suitability Determination for Donors of Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products) was published in proposed form on Sept. 30, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 52696)
  • 13
    • 0042687653 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The GTP Rule (Current Good Tissue Practices for Manufacturers of Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products; Inspection and Enforcement) was published in proposed form on January 8, 2000 (66 Fed. Reg. 1508)
    • The GTP Rule (Current Good Tissue Practices for Manufacturers of Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Products; Inspection and Enforcement) was published in proposed form on January 8, 2000 (66 Fed. Reg. 1508)
  • 14
    • 0041685874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 68 Fed. Reg. 2689 (2003)
    • 68 Fed. Reg. 2689 (2003)
  • 15
    • 0042186573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.21 April 1, 2002
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.21 April 1, 2002
  • 16
    • 0042186575 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.26 April 1, 2002
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.26 April 1, 2002
  • 17
    • 0041685881 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.1(b) April 1, 2002
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.1(b) April 1, 2002
  • 18
    • 0042687658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Presentation of Martha A. Wells of FDA's Center for Biologics, Evaluation and Research, University of Kentucky Workshop, Nov. 9, 2002
    • Presentation of Martha A. Wells of FDA's Center for Biologics, Evaluation and Research, University of Kentucky Workshop, Nov. 9, 2002
  • 19
    • 0043188671 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FDA has indicated that examples of acceptable sterilizing, preserving, and storage agents would include cryoprotectants (e.g., DMSO); chemicals used for sterilization (e.g. ethylene oxide); and storage solutions. 66 Fed. Reg. at 5459. Comment 30
    • FDA has indicated that examples of acceptable sterilizing, preserving, and storage agents would include cryoprotectants (e.g., DMSO); chemicals used for sterilization (e.g. ethylene oxide); and storage solutions. 66 Fed. Reg. at 5459. Comment 30
  • 21
    • 0042687667 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • www.fda.gov/cber/minutes/asrm041601.htm
  • 22
    • 0042186581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The written comments are discussed in detail in the Preamble to the final Establishment Registration Rule, supra note 11
    • The written comments are discussed in detail in the Preamble to the final Establishment Registration Rule, supra note 11
  • 23
    • 0041685888 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.3(e) (April 1, 2002)
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.3(e) (April 1, 2002)
  • 24
    • 0043188673 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.15 (April 1, 2002)
    • 21 C.F.R. § 1271.15 (April 1, 2002)
  • 25
    • 0042186586 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 68 Fed. Reg. 2689, 2690 (Jan. 21, 2003)
    • 68 Fed. Reg. 2689, 2690 (Jan. 21, 2003)
  • 26
    • 0043188672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 42 U.S.C. § 271, 2003
    • 42 U.S.C. § 271, 2003
  • 27
    • 0042687668 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559 and 3571 (c) 2000
    • 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559 and 3571 (c) 2000
  • 28
    • 0041685892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See specifically the enforcement regulations contained in the proposed GTP Rule
    • See specifically the enforcement regulations contained in the proposed GTP Rule
  • 29
    • 0041685887 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Form FDA 3356 can be found on FDA's website at http://forms.psc.gov/forms/FDA/FDA-3356.pdf
  • 30
    • 0042186567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5457. "By "immediate use," we mean that the reproductive materials are used promptly enough that cryopreservation is not necessary and is not performed. This exception is intended to cover an establishment that recovers semen for use in the artificial insemination of the donor's sexually intimate partner. We believe that this situation raises few new infectious disease concerns. For this reason, we are excepting these establishments from registering and from the other requirements will be contained in part 1271. The exception does not extend to the recovery of cells or tissues from close relative who are not sexually intimate partners, since an increased risk of communicable disease transmission exists in this situation."
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5457. "By "immediate use," we mean that the reproductive materials are used promptly enough that cryopreservation is not necessary and is not performed. This exception is intended to cover an establishment that recovers semen for use in the artificial insemination of the donor's sexually intimate partner. We believe that this situation raises few new infectious disease concerns. For this reason, we are excepting these establishments from registering and from the other requirements will be contained in part 1271. The exception does not extend to the recovery of cells or tissues from close relative who are not sexually intimate partners, since an increased risk of communicable disease transmission exists in this situation."
  • 32
    • 0042687656 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/drh/art.htm. The website includes the 2000 pregnancy success rate report as well as the five earlier reports published under the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act
  • 33
    • 0041685885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Data presented to FDA by SART
    • Data presented to FDA by SART
  • 34
    • 0042186574 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5452 (Jan. 19, 2001)
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5452 (Jan. 19, 2001)
  • 35
    • 0041685880 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • www.fda.gov/cber/ltr/cytotrans070601
  • 36
    • 0043188666 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 58 Fed. Reg. 53248 (Oct. 14, 1993)
    • 58 Fed. Reg. 53248 (Oct. 14, 1993)
  • 37
    • 0042687652 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington Post, July 11, 2001, A2. Weiss noted that this assertion of authority "differs in that it relates to fertility procedures. Medical procedures generally fall under the category of 'the practice of medicine,' which the FDA does not usually oversee out of respect for doctors' freedom to treat their patients as they see fit"
    • Washington Post, July 11, 2001, A2. Weiss noted that this assertion of authority "differs in that it relates to fertility procedures. Medical procedures generally fall under the category of 'the practice of medicine,' which the FDA does not usually oversee out of respect for doctors' freedom to treat their patients as they see fit."
  • 38
    • 0042186580 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • March
    • www.fda.gov/cber/ltr/humemb (March 2002)
    • (2002)
  • 39
    • 0042687659 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 63 Fed. Reg. 5450 (Jan. 19, 2001)
    • 63 Fed. Reg. 5450 (Jan. 19, 2001)
  • 41
    • 0041685877 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5462 (emphasis added) (Jan. 19, 2001)
    • 66 Fed. Reg. 5462 (emphasis added) (Jan. 19, 2001)
  • 42
    • 0042687646 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See, e.g., Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5 (1925) (the direct control of medical practice is beyond the power of the federal government); Federal Trade Commission v. Simeon Management Corp., 391 F. Supp. 697 (N.D. Cal. 1975) (discussing the congressional intent as reflected in the legislative history of the 1938 Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the 1962 amendments to it - repeated statements that Congress did not intend the FDA to interfere with the medical practice); United States v. Evers, 453 E Supp. 114 (M.D. Ala. 1978); aff'd 643 F.2d 1043 (5th Cir. 1981); Washington Legal Foundation v. Henney, 202 E3d 331 (D.C. Cir. 2000). See also Rokosz, G.J., Human Cloning; Is the Reach of FDA Authority Too Far a Stretch, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 464(2000)
    • See, e.g., Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5 (1925) (the direct control of medical practice is beyond the power of the federal government); Federal Trade Commission v. Simeon Management Corp., 391 F. Supp. 697 (N.D. Cal. 1975) (discussing the congressional intent as reflected in the legislative history of the 1938 Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the 1962 amendments to it - repeated statements that Congress did not intend the FDA to interfere with the medical practice); United States v. Evers, 453 E Supp. 114 (M.D. Ala. 1978); aff'd 643 F.2d 1043 (5th Cir. 1981); Washington Legal Foundation v. Henney, 202 E3d 331 (D.C. Cir. 2000). See also Rokosz, G.J., Human Cloning; Is the Reach of FDA Authority Too Far a Stretch, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 464 (2000)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.