Next generation healthy soup: An exploration using conjoint analysis

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 249-268

  Krieger, Bert ^a   Cappuccio, Roberto ^b   Katz, Rachel ^a   Moskowitz, Howard ^a  

^a Moskcwitz Jacobs Inc   (United States)

^b Aromalab illycaffè S p A   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; NUTRITION; PRODUCT DESIGN; SENSORY PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

PSYCHOGRAPHIC VARIABLES;

FOOD PRODUCTS;

EID: 0043159092     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2003.tb00388.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. BOX, G.E.P., HUNTER, J. and HUNTER, S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley, New York.
2. BROPHY, B. and SCHARDT, D. 1999. Nutrition Action, April. www.cspinet.org/nah/4_99/functional_foods.htm
3. GREEN, P.E., CARROLL, J.D. and GOLDBERG, S.M. 1981. A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. J. Marketing 45, 17-37.
4. GREEN, P.E. and KRIEGER, A.M. 1991. Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. J. Marketing 55, 20-31.
5. GREEN, P.E. and SRINIVASAN, V. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. 5, 103-123.
6. Ingredient Strategist, 2000. Functional foods - a growth opportunity, 1, 99-114.
7. LABUZA, T.P. 2000. Functional foods and dietary supplements: Safety, good manufacturing practice (GMPs) and shelf life testing. In Essentials of Functional Foods, (M.K. Schmidl and T.P. Labuza, eds.) Aspen Press, London.
8. LASER REUTERSWARD, A. and SVEDBERG, E. 1999. Functional foods. The consumer, the products and the evidence. Scand. J. Nutr/Naringsforskning 43, 163-168.
9. MITCHELL, A. 1983. The Nine American Lifestyles, Macmillan, New York.
10. th ESOMAR Congress, pp. 535-552, Istanbul.
11. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1996b. Segmenting consumers on the basis of their response to concept elements: An approach derived from product research. Canadian J. Market Res. 75, 38-54.
12. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., BECKLEY, J. and MASCUCH, T.C. 2002a. Romancing the olive. Food Qual. Pref. Accepted for Publication.
13. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., GOFMAN, A., ITTY, B., KATZ, R., MANCHAIAH, M. and MA, Z. 2002b. Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation & optimization - The use and promise of self-authoring conjoint analysis for the foodservice industry. Foodservice Technol. In Press.
14. MOSKOWITZ, H., ITTY, B., HIRSCH, J. and BECKLEY, J. 2002c. Identifying consumer needs for functional foods from analysis of current communications on the Internet submitted to Appetite.
15. New Nutrition Business. 2000. 5.
16. NEW-NUTRITION.COM 2002. http://www. new-nutrition.com/newspage/260702d.htm
17. Rowett Research Institute news & reviews 2, June 2002. www.rowett.ac.uk
18. SYSTAT. 1997. Systat, the System for Statistics. Systat Division of SPSS Corp., Evanston, Ill.
19. WELLS, W.D. 1975. Psychographics, A critical review. J. Marketing Res. 72, 196-213.
20. WENNSTROM, P. 2000. Functional foods and the consumer's perception of health claims. Scand. J. Nutr/Naringsforskning 44, 30-33.
21. WITTINK, D.R. and CATTIN, P. 1989. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. J. Marketing 55, 91-96.