The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking

Technovation

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 823-831

  Pérez, Manuela Pérez ^a   Sánchez, Angel Martínez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Regional innovation networks; Technology transfer; University spin offs

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SALES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

NETWORKING; UNIVERSITIES;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0043130266     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00034-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Acs Z., et al. R&D spillovers and innovative activity. Managerial and Decision Economics. 15:(2):1994;131-138.
2. Anselin, L., et al., 1996. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Paper presented at the Forty-Third North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Washington, DC.
3. Autio E. New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research Policy. 26:(3):1997;263-281.
4. Autio E., Kauranan I. Technologist entrepreneurs versus non-entrepreneurial technologists: analysis of motivational triggering factors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 6:(4):1994;315-328.
5. Autio E., Yli-renko H. New, technology-based firms as agents of technological rejuvenation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 10:(1):1998;71-92.
6. Chell E., et al. The Entrepreneurial Personality: Concepts, Cases and Categories. 1991;Routledge, London.
7. Conner K., Prahalad K. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science. 7:(5):1996;477-501.
8. Cooper A. Contrasts in the role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 1984;Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
9. Dahlstrand A. Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms. Research Policy. 26:(5):1997;331-344.
10. Donckels R., Lambrecht J. Networks and small business growth: an explanatory model. Small Business Economics. 7:(4):1995;273-289.
11. Dorfman N. Route 128: the development of a regional high-technology economy. Research Policy. 12:(6):1993;299-316.
12. Forrest J., Martin M. Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organizations: experiences in the biotechnology industry. R&D Management. 10:(1):1994;41-53.
13. Granstrand O., Alänge S. The evolution of corporate entrepreneurship in swedish industry - was Schumpeter wrong? Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 5:(1):1995;1-24.
14. Grant R. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science. 7:(4):1996;373-387.
15. Harmon B., et al. Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing. 12:(6):1997;423-434.
16. Von Hippel E. Sources of innovation. 1988;Oxford University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Jones D. Technical entrepreneurship, experience and the management of small technology-based firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 9:(2):1997;65-90.
18. Kamshad K., Hay M. Measuring the value of growth: the SME dilemma. Journal of Economic Literature. 34:(2):1996;39-56.
19. MacPherson A. Academic-industry linkages and small firm innovation: evidence from the scientific instruments sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 10:(4):1998;261-275.
20. Martínez A., Urbina O. Entrepreneurship networks and high technology firms: the case of Aragon. Technovation. 18:(5):1998;335-345.
21. Mian S. Assessing and managing the university technology business incubation: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing. 12:(3):1997;251-285.
22. Oakey R. New, Technology-based Firms in the 1990s. 1994;Paul Chapman, London.
23. Oakey R. High-technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth. 1995;Paul Chapman, London.
24. Olofsson C., et al. Technology-based new ventures from Swedish universities: a survey. Churchill N., et al. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 1987;605-616 Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
25. Raffa M., et al. The development process of small firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 8:(5):1996;359-371.
26. Ripsas S. Towards an interdisciplinary theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 10:(2):1998;103-115.
27. Roberts E. Evolving toward product and market orientation: the early years of technology-based firms. Journal of Product and Innovation Management. 7:(4):1990;274-287.
28. Roberts E. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. 1991;Oxford University Press, New York.
29. Roberts E., Malone D. Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R&D Management. 26:(1):1996;17-48.
30. Rothwell R., Dodgson M. Technology-based SMEs: their role in industrial and economic change. International Journal of Technology Management. 8:(1):1993;8-22.
31. Smilor R. Managing the incubator system: critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 34:(3):1987;146-155.
32. Spender J. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17:(1):1996;45-62.
33. Steffensen M., et al. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing. 15:(1):2000;93-111.
34. Teece D., et al. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 18:(7):1997;509-533.
35. Wallmark, T., Sjösten, J., 1994. Stability and turbulence among spin-off companies from Chalmers University. Eighth Nordic Conference on Small Business Research, Halmstad.