A time-distance criterion for evaluating forecasting models

International Journal of Forecasting

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 199-215

  Granger, Clive W J ^a   Jeon, Yongil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forecasting evaluation; Leading indicators; Time distance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043095777     PISSN: 01692070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00030-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cox D.R.Regression models and life tables (with discussion) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 34 1972 187-220
2. Clements M.P. Hendry D.F. On the limitations of comparing mean square forecast errors; Comments; Reply Journal of Forecasting 12 1993 617-676
3. Engle R.F. The economics of ultra-high frequency data Econometrica 68 2000 1-22
4. Engle R.F. Russell J. Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data Econometrica 66 1998 1127-1162
5. Granger C.W.J. Can we improve the perceived quality of economic forecasts? Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 1996 455-473
6. Granger C.W.J. Hatanaka M. Spectral analysis of economic time series 1964 Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
7. Granger C.W.J. Newbold P. Forecasting economic time series 2nd ed. 1986 Academic Press New York
8. Granger C.W.J. Teräsvirta T. Anderson H.M. Modeling nonlinearity over the business cycle In Stock J.H. Watson M.W. (Eds.), Business cycles, indicators, and forecasting 1993 University of Chicago PressChicago, IL
9. Hamilton J.D. Perez-Quiros G. What do the leading indicators lead? Journal of Business 69 1996 27-49
10. Kalbfleisch J. Prentice R. The statistical analysis of failure time data 1980 WileyNew York
11. King R.G. Plosser C.I. Stock J.H. Watson M.W. Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations American Economic Review 81 1991 819-840
12. Miller R.G. Survival analysis 1981 WileyNew York
13. Randles R.H.Wolfe D.A. Introduction to the theory of non-parametric statistics 1979 Wiley New York
14. Sicherl, P., 1973. Time Distance as a Dynamic Measure of Disparities in Social and Economic Development, Kyklos, XXVI, Fasc. 3.
15. Sicherl P. Integrating Comparisons Across Time and Space: Methodology and Applications To Disparities Within Yugoslavia 1993 Centre For The Study of Public Policy, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, Scotland