Exploring the nature of switch cost: Inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials

Brain Research Protocols

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 49-59

  Hsieh, Shulan ^a   Yu, Yen Ting ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Advance reconfiguration; Carry over effect; Lateral readiness potential; P300; Preparatory cueing effect; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0043092055     PISSN: 1385299X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00071-0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Umiltà C., Moscovitch M. Attention and Performance: XV. 1994;421-452 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Allport A., Wylie G. Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Monsell S., Driver J. Attention and Performance: XVIII. 2000;35-70 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology. 26:1989;251-269.
4. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Monsell S., Driver J. Attention and Performance: XVIII. 2000;331-355 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14:1988;331-344.
6. Hsieh S. Stimulus-driven or autonomous shift of attention? Percept. Mot. Skills. 80:1995;1187-1199.
7. Hsieh S. Two component processes in switching attention: a study of event-related potentials. Percept. Mot. Skills. 94:2002;1168-1176.
8. Hsieh S., Allport A. Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm. Percept. Mot. Skills. 79:1994;315-335.
9. Hsieh S., Yu Y.T. Switching between simple response-sets: inferences from the lateralized readiness potentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 17:2003;228-237.
10. A.T. Jersild, Mental set and shift, Arch. Psychol. 89 (1927).
11. de Jong R., Coles M.G.H., Logan G., Gratton G. In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16:1990;164-182.
12. Kutas M., Donchin E. Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 2002:1980;95-115.
13. Kutas M., McCarthy G., Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science. 197:1977;792-795.
14. Leuthold H., Jentzsch I. Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution: an electrophysiological analysis. Biol. Psychol. 60:2002;173-198.
15. Leuthold H., Sommer W., Ulrich R. Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the Lateralized Readiness Potential. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125:1996;307-323.
16. Luck S.J. Sources of dual-task interference: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol. Sci. 9:1998;223-227.
17. McCarthy G., Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science. 211:1981;77-80.
18. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22:1996;1-20.
19. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychol. Res. 63:2000;234-249.
20. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cogn. Psychol. 41:2000;211-253.
21. Miller J., Hackley S.A. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121:1992;195-209.
22. Monsell S. Control of mental processes. Bruce V. Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind: Tutorial Essays in Cognition. 1996;93-148 Erlbaum, Taylor & Francis, Hove, UK.
23. Osman A.M., Bashore T.R., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E., Meyer D.E. On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18:1992;217-232.
24. Osman A., Moore C.M. The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19:1993;1292-1312.
25. Picton T.W., Lins O.G., Scherg M. The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. Boller F., Grafman J. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 10:1995;3-73 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
26. Rogers R.D., Andrews T.C., Grasby P.M., Brooks D.J., Robbins T.W. Contrasting cortical and subcortical activations produced by attentional-set shifting and reversal learning in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;142-162.
27. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124:1995;207-231.
28. Rogers R.D., Sahakian B.J., Hodges R.J., Polkey C.E., Kennard C., Robbins T.W. Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson's disease. Brain. 121:1998;815-842.
29. J.S. Rubinstein, Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1993.
30. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;763-797.
31. Ruthruff E., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;1404-1419.
32. Smid H.G.O.M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J.M. The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and central motor aspects. Johnson R. Jr., Rohrbaugh J.W., Parasuraman R. Current Trends in Event-related Potential Research, Eeg Suppl. 40. 1987;270-278 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
33. Smulders F.T.Y. The Selectivity of Age Effects On Information Processing: Response Times and Electrophysiology. 1993;University of Amsterdam Press, Amsterdam.
34. Smulders F.T.Y., Kenemans J.L., Kok A. Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;194-205.
35. Sohn M.H., Anderson J.R. Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130:2001;764-778.
36. Sohn M.H., Carlson R.A. Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26:2000;1445-1460.
37. Sohn M.H., Ursu S., Anderson J.R., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;13448-13453.
38. Sommer W., Leuthold H., Schubert T. Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 8:2001;81-88.
39. Spector A., Biederman I. Mental set and mental shift revisited. Am. J. Psychol. 89:1976;669-679.
40. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: the method of additive factors. Acta Psychol. 30:1969;276-315.
41. Swainson R., Rogers R.D., Sahakian B.J., Summers B.A., Polkey C.E., Robbins T.W. Probabilistic learning and reversal deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease or frontal or temporal lobe lesions: possible adverse effects of dopaminergic medications. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;596-612.
42. Wilson G.F., Swain C.R., Ullsperger P. ERP components elicited in response to warning stimuli: the influence of task difficulty. Biol. Psychol. 47:1998;137-158.
43. Wylie G., Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of 'switch costs'. Psychol. Res. 63:2000;212-233.