Patterns of errors made by students with disabilities on a reading test with oral reading administration

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 602-614

  Barton, Karen E ^a   Huynh, Huynh ^b  

^a CTB MCGRAW HILL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodations; Error patterns; Oral reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043072820     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403256363     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1986). Statistical methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Dellen.
2. Bernstein, D., & Tiegerman, E. (1989). Language and communication disorders in children (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3. Bryson, S. E., & Werker, J. F. (1989). Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled children, Part I: Vowel errors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 1-12.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Fisher, D. L. (1981). Functional literacy tests: A model of question-answering and an analysis of errors. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 418-447.
6. Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 9-30.
7. Hallahan, D., & Kauffman, J. (1988). Exceptional children: Introduction to special education (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Huynh, H., Gleaton, J. U., & Seaman, S. P. (1990). Technical documentation for the South Carolina High School Exit Examination of reading and mathematics (Paper No. 2). Columbia: University of South Carolina.
9. McCormick, S. (1992). Disabled readers' erroneous responses to inferential comprehension questions: Description and analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 55-77.
10. National Assessment of Education Progress. (1996). The NAEP 1994 Technical Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
11. National Council for Educational Outcomes. (1993, March). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities: A review of the literature. Synthesis Report No. 4, St. Cloud State University and National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 656)
12. Norusis, M. J. (1998). SPSS 8.0 Guides to data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93-120.
14. Rasinski, T. V., & Padak, N. D. (1998). How elementary students referred from compensatory reading instruction perform on school-based measures of word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 19(2), 185-216.
15. Rock, D. A., Bennett, R. E., & Jirele, T. (1988). Factor structure of the Graduate Record Examination's general test in handicapped and non-handicapped groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 383-392.
16. Rock, D. A., Bennett, R. E., & Kaplan, B. A. (1987). Internal construct validity of a college admissions test across handicapped and non-handicapped groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 193-205.
17. SAS Institute. (1990). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6 (4th ed., Vol. 1). Cary, NC: Author.
18. Seidenberg, M. S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G., & Backman, J. (1985). Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ? Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 161-180.
19. Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. South Carolina Department of Education. (2001, Spring). Test administrator's manual (BSAP Exit). Columbia, SC: Author.
21. Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.
22. Tippets, E., & Michaels, H. (1997, March). Factor structure invariance of accommodated and non-accommodated performance assessments. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago.
23. U.S. Congress. (1973). Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. § 504). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. U.S. Congress. (1990). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (PL 101-336). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. U.S. Congress. (1994). Improving America's Schools Act (PL 103-382, Op.lit. § 1115 [b][2]). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Werker, J. F., Bryson, S. E., & Wassenberg, K. (1989). Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled readers part II: Consonant errors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 13-30.
27. Willingham, W. W. (1989). Standard testing conditions and standard score meaning for handicapped examinees. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 97-103.