Arguments and deontic decisions

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 27-47

  Green, David W ^a   McClelland, Alastair ^a   Muckli, Lars ^a   Simmons, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arguments; Decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043065629     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00043-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking and reasoning, 1, 221-235.
2. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendurst, R., Henkemans, F. S., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: a handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: causes and consequences. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
5. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.
6. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Wason, P. C. (1976). Rationalization in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 205-212.
7. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330-344.
8. Glenberg, A. M., Kruley, P., & Langston, W. E. (1994). Analogical processes in comprehension: simulation of a mental model. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Green, D. W. (1995). The abstract selection task: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. In S. Newstead, & J. St. B. T. Evans (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 173-188). Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Green, D. W. (1996). Models, arguments and decisions. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science: A festschrift for Philip Johnson-Laird (pp. 119-137). Hove: Psychology Press.
11. Griggs, R. A. (1983). The role of problem content in the selection task and THOG problem. In J. St. B. T. Evans (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches (pp. 16-43). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory, vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hoch, S. J. (1985). Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 719-731.
14. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
15. Huff, A. S. (1991). Mapping strategic thought. New York: Wiley.
16. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
18. Koehler, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
19. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107-118.
20. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
22. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124-129.
23. Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focusing in reasoning and decision-making. Cognition, 49, 37-66.
24. Lipshitz, R. (1993). Decision-making as argument-driven action. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, & R. Calderwood (Eds.), Decision-making in action: models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
25. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1241.
26. Macrae, C. N. (1992). A tale of two curries: counter-factual thinking and accident-related judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 84-87.
27. Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Counterfactual thinking and the perception of criminal behavior. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 221-226.
28. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: theory, cases and techniques. New York: Wiley.
29. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
30. Oatley, K. G. (1996). Emotions, rationality, and informal reasoning. In J. Oakhill, & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental Models in Cognitive Science: A Festschrift for Philip Johnson-Laird (pp. 175-196). Hove/ London: LEA.
31. Oatley, K. G., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions: empirical tests, mental models, and implications for social interaction. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 363-393). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Over, D. E., & Manktelow, K. I. (1993). Rationality, utility and deontic reasoning. In K. I. Manktelow, & D. E. Over (Eds.), Rationality: psychological and philosophical perspectives (pp. 231-259). London: Routledge.
33. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision-making. Cognition, 49, 123-163.
34. Perkins, D. N. (1989). Reasoning as it is and could be: an empirical perspective. In D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell, & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: the third international conference on thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (cited in Baron, 1995).
35. Redelmeier, D. A., Koehler, D. J., Lieberman, V., & Tversky, A. (1995). Probability judgment in medicine: discounting unspecified alternatives. Medical Decision Making, 15, 227-230.
36. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
37. Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
38. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
40. Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547-567.
41. Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction,1, 337-350.
42. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.
43. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
44. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123.