Competition among markets: The repeal of Rule 390

Journal of Banking and Finance

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1711-1736

  Kam, Tai Kong ^a   Panchapagesan, Venkatesh ^b   Weaver, Daniel G ^c  

^a Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association College Retirement Equities Fund   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Intermarket competition; NYSE Rule 390

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043032947     PISSN: 03784266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(03)00097-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahn H. Cao C. Choe H. Tick size, spread, and volume Journal of Financial Intermediation 5 1996 2-22
2. Angel, J., 1997. Who gets price improvement on the NYSE? Working paper, Georgetown University
3. Bacidore, J., Ross, K., Sofianos, G., 1999. Quantifying best execution at the New York Stock Exchange: Market orders. Working paper, New York Stock Exchange
4. Battalio R. Third market broker-dealers: Cost competitors or cream skimmers? Journal of Finance 52 1997 341-352
5. Battalio R. Holden C. A simple model of payment for order flow, internalization, and total trading cost Journal of Financial Markets 4 2001 33-71
6. Battalio R.H. Green J. Jennings R. Do competing specialists and preferencing dealers affect market quality? Review of Financial Studies 10 1997 969-993
7. Battalio R. Greene J. Jennings R. Order flow, trade quality, and liquidity provision: Merrill Lynch's decision to cease making markets on the regional stock exchanges Journal of Financial Intermediation 7 1998 338-358
8. Bessembinder H. Kaufman H. A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocks Journal of Financial Economics 46 1997 293-320
9. Bloch E. Schwartz R. The great debate over NYSE Rule 390 Journal of Portfolio Management 5 1 1978 5
10. Branch B. Freed W. Bid-asked spreads on the AMEX and the Big Board Journal of Finance 32 1977 159-163
11. Christie W. Huang R. Market structures and liquidity: A transactions data study of exchange listings Journal of Financial Intermediation 3 1994 300-326
12. Cohen K.J. Conroy R.M. An empirical study of the effect of Rule 19c-3 Journal of Law and Economics 33 1990 277-305
13. Cohen K. Maier S. Schwartz R.A. Whitcomb D. Transaction costs, order placement strategy, and existence of the bid-ask spread The Journal of Political Economy 89 1981 287-305
14. Davis J.L. Lightfoot L.E. Fragmentation versus consolidation of securities trading: Evidence from the operation of Rule 19c-3 Journal of Law and Economics 41 1998 209-238
15. Domowitz I. Steil B. Innovation in equity trading systems: The impact on transactions costs and cost of capital Technological Innovation and Economic Performance 2001 Princeton University Press forthcoming
16. Easley D. Kiefer N.M. O'Hara M. Cream-skimming or profit-sharing? The curious role of purchased order flow The Journal of Finance 51 1996 811-833
17. Glosten L. Insider trading, liquidity, and the role of the monopolistic specialist Journal of Business 62 1989 211-236
18. Hamilton J.L. Marketplace fragmentation, competition, and the efficiency of the Stock Exchange Journal of Finance 34 1 1979 171-187
19. Lee C. Ready M. Inferring trade direction from intraday data Journal of Finance 41 1991 733-746
20. Lee C. Mucklow B. Ready M. Spreads, depths, and the impact of earnings information, An intraday study Review of Financial Studies 6 1993 345-374
21. Ronen T. Weaver D. Teenies anyone? Journal of Financial Markets 4 2001 231-260
22. Schwartz R. Weaver D. What we think about the quality of our equity markets Journal of Portfolio Management Summer 2001 1-8
23. Stoll, H., 1985. The Stock Exchange Specialist System: An Economic Analysis. In: Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, 2, New York University