A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models

Economics Letters

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 391-397

  Baltagi, Badi H ^a   Egger, Peter ^b   Pfaffermayr, Michael ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bilateral trade flows; Gravity model; Interaction effects; Panel econometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043032807     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00115-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson J.E. Marcouiller D. Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation Review of Economics and Statistics 84 2002 342-352
2. Baltagi B.H. Econometric analysis of panel data 2001 Wiley and SonsChichester
3. Bergstrand J.H. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade Economic Journal 100 1990 1216-1229
4. Cheng, I-H., Wall, H., 1999. Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper No. 1999-010C.
5. Davis P. Estimating multi-way error components models with unbalanced data structures Journal of Econometrics 1061 2002 67-95
6. Deardorff A.V. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? Frankel J.A. The Regionalization of the World Economy NBER Project Report Series 1998 7-22 University of Chicago PressChicago and London
7. Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M., forthcoming. The proper econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects, Empirical Economics.
8. Ghosh S.K. Estimating from a more general times-series cum cross-section data structures The American Economist 201 1976 15-21
9. Ghosh, S., Yamarik, S., 2002. Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Paper presented at the Spring 2002 Midwest International Economics Meeting.
10. Glick R. Rose A.K. Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence European Economic Review 466 2002 1125-1151
11. Gould D.M. Immigrant links to the home country: Empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows Review of Economics and Statistics 76 1994 302-316
12. Helpman E. Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries Journal of the Japanese and the International Economies 11 1987 62-81
13. Helpman E. The structure of foreign trade Journal of Economic Perspectives 132 1999 121-144
14. Helpman E. Krugman P.R. Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy 1985 MIT PressCambridge, MA
15. Hummels D. Levinsohn J.Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence Quarterly Journal of Economics 1103 1995 799-836
16. Krugman P.R. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade American Economic Review 70 1980 950-959
17. Linder S.B. An Essay On Trade and Transformation 1961 John WileyNew York
18. Mátyás L. Proper econometric specification of the gravity model The World Economy 203 1997 363-368
19. Oguledo V.I. MacPhee C.R. Gravity models: A reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements Applied Economics 262 1994 107-120
20. Wansbeek T. Kapteyn A. Estimation of the error-components model with incomplete panels Journal of Econometrics 413 1989 341-361
21. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity Econometrica 48 1980 817-838