It's a neighborhood now: Practicing forestry at the urban fringe

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 6-13

  Edwards, Kearstin K ^a   Bliss, John C ^b  

^a Powell Ranger District   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Public relations; Urban forestry; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS; URBAN PLANNING;

LAND FRAGMENTATION;

FORESTRY;

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; GREENSPACE; LAND USE PLANNING; URBAN FORESTRY; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0043022165     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION. 1996. Statutory summary for the state of Oregon. Available online at www. planning.org/growingsmart/summaries.htm; last accessed by staff February 2003.
2. BENTON COUNTY, OREGON. 1999. Benton County Development Code, 31-71. Corvallis, OR.
3. BLISS, J.C., S.K. NEPAL, R.T. BROOKS JR., and M.D. LARSEN. 1997. In the mainstream: Environmental attitudes of mid-South forest owners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21(1):37-42.
4. BOURKE, L., and A.E. LULOFF. 1994. Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land. Society and Natural Resources 7(5):445-57.
5. BUSE, L.J., R.G. WAGNER, and B. PERRIN. 1995. Public attitudes towards forest herbicide use and the implications for public involvement. Forestry Chronicle 71(5):596-600.
6. OREGON FOREST RESOURCES INSTITUTE (OFRI). 1999. Oregonians discuss forest values, management goals and related issues: A public opinion research project. Unpublished report by Davis and Hibbitts, Inc. Portland, OR.
7. OREGON LEGISLATURE. 1999. Chapter 527: Insect and disease control; Forest practices. 2001.
8. ROBSON, C. 1993. Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
9. SAMPSON, R.J. 1991. Linking the macro and micro-level dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces 70:43-64.
10. SHINDLER, B.M., P. LIST, and B.S. STEEL., 1993. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry 91(7):36-42.
11. STRAUSS, A., and J. CORBIN. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. US BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 2001. Statistical abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington, DC.
13. WAGNER, R.G., J. FLYNN, and G. ROBIN. 1998a. Public perceptions of risk and acceptability of forest vegetation management alternatives in Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 74(5):720-27.
14. WAGNER, R G., J. FLYNN, G. ROBIN, C.K. MERTZ, and P. SLOVIC. 1998b. Acceptable practices in Ontario's forests: Differences between the public and forestry professionals. New Forests 16:139-54.