Comments on "the differentiation between grid spacing and resolution and their application to numerical modeling"

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Volumn 81, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 2475-2477

  Walters, Michael K ^a  

^a AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042994150     PISSN: 00030007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2475:CAACOT>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Anderson, J. D., Jr., 1995: Computational Fluid Dynamics, The Basics with Applications. McGraw-Hill, 547 pp.
2. Arakawa, A., 1972: Design of the UCLA general circulation model. Numerical Simulation of Weather and Climate, Dept. of Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles, Tech. Rept. 7, 116 pp.
3. _, and V. R. Lamb, 1977: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Meth. Comput. Phys., 17, 174-265.
4. Grasso, L. D., 2000: The differentiation between grid spacing and resolution and their application to numerical modeling. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 579-580.
5. Haltiner, G. J., and R. T. Williams, 1980: Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. 2d ed. John Wiley and Sons, 477 pp.
6. Mesinger, F., and A. Arakawa, 1976: Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. GARP Publication Series No. 14, WMO/ ICSU Joint Organizing Committee, 64 pp.
7. Pielke, R. A., 1984: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling. Academic Press, 612 pp.
8. Winninghoff, F. J., 1968: On the adjustment toward a geostrophic balance in a simple primitive equation model with application to the problems of initialization and objective analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles, 161 pp.