Using many cameras as one

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Pless, Robert ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SENSORS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

EPIPOLAR GEOMETRY; IMAGING DEVICE; PANORAMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS;

CAMERAS;

EID: 0042941721     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. G. Adiv, Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3-D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11:477-489, 1989.
2. Patrick Baker, Cornelia Fermuller, Yiannis Aloimonos, and Robert Pless. A spherical eye from multiple camera (makes better models of the world). In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001.
3. Patrick Baker, Robert Pless, Cornelia Fermuller, and Yiannis Aloimonos. New eyes for shape and motion estimation. In Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV2000), 2000.
4. Simon Baker and Shree K. Nayar. A theory of single-viewpoint catadioptric image formation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999.
5. T. Brodský, C. Fermüller, and Y Aloimonos. Directions of motion fields are hardly ever ambiguous. International Journal of Computer Vision, 26:5-24, 1998.
6. Atsushi Chaen, Kazumasa Yamamzawa, Naokazu Yokoya, and Haruo Takemura. Acquisition of three-dimensional information using omnidirectional stereo vision. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, volume I, pages 288-295, 1998.
7. P. Chang and M. Hebert. Omni-directional structure from motion. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Omnidirectional Vision, pages 127-133, Hilton Head Island, SC, June 2000. IEEE Computer Society.
8. K. Daniilidis and M.E. Spetsakis. Understanding noise sensitivity in structure from motion. In Y. Aloimonos, editor, Visual Navigation: From Biological Systems to Unmanned Ground Vehicles, chapter 4. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1997.
9. Christopher Geyer and Kostas Daniilidis. Structure and motion from uncalibrated catadioptric views. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2001.
10. Christopher Geyer and Kostas Daniilidis. Properties of the catadioptric fundamental matrix. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2002.
11. Joshua Gluckman and Shree Nayar. Planar catadioptric streo: Geometry and calibration. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, 1999.
12. Joshua Gluckman and Shree K. Nayar. Ego-motion and omnidirectional cameras. In ICCV, pages 999-1005, 1998.
13. Micheal D. Grossberg and Shree Nayar. A general imaging model and a method for finding its parameters. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, volume II, pages 108-115, 2001.
14. Rajiv Gupta and Richard Hartley. Linear pushbroom cameras. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(9):963-975, 1997.
15. R. Andrew Hicks and Ruzena Bajcsy. Catadioptric sensors that approximate wide-angle perspective projections. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 545-551, 2000.
16. Randall Nelson and John Aloimonos. Finding motion parameters from spherical flow fields (or the advantage of having eyes in the back of your head). Biological Cybernetics, 58:261-273, 1988.
17. Tomas Pajdla. Stereo with oblique cameras. International Journal of Computer Vision, 47(1):161-170, 2002.
18. J. Plücker. On a new geometry of space. Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155:725-791, 1865.
19. Steven M Seitz. The space of all stereo images. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, volume I, pages 26-33, 2001.
20. H Y Shum, A Kalai, and S M Seitz. Omnivergent stereo. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22-29, 1999.
21. S. Soatto and R. Brockett. Optimal structure from motion: Local ambiguities and global estimates. In CVPR, 1998.
22. H W Sorenson. Paramerer Estimation, Principles and Problems. Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, 1980.
23. Peter Sturm. Mixing catadioptric and perspective cameras. In Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Omnidirectional Vision, 2002.
24. T Svoboda, T Pajdla, and V Hlavac. Epipolar geometry for panoramic cameras. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, 1998.
25. Rahul Swaminathan, Michael Grossberg, and Shree Nayar. Caustics of catadioptric cameras. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2001.