Stemflow estimation in a redwood forest using model-based stratified random sampling

Environmetrics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 559-571

  Lewis, Jack ^a  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Interception; Model assisted; Sampling design; Stemflow

Indexed keywords

STEMFLOW;

SEQUOIA; SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS;

EID: 0042914862     PISSN: 11804009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/env.603     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aboal JR, Morales D, Henrandez M, Jimenez MS. 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Journal of Hydrology 21: 161-175.
2. Anderson AR, Pyatt DG. 1986. Interception of precipitation by pole-stage Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine and mature Sitka spruce at Kielder Forest, Northumberland. Forestry 59(1): 29-38.
3. Asdak C, Jarvis PG, van Gardingen P, Fraser A. 1998. Rainfall interception loss in unlogged and logged forest areas of central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Hydrology 206: 237-244.
4. Cape JN, Brown AHF, Robertson SMC, Howson G, Paterson IS. 1991. Interspecies comparisons of throughfall and stemflow at three sites in northern Britain. Forest Ecology and Management 46: 165-177.
5. Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley & Sons: New York; 132-134.
6. Crockford RH, Richardson DP. 1990. Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and pine plantation of southeastern Australia, II: stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry aclerophyll eucalypt forest and Pinus radiata plantation. Hydrological Processes 4: 145-155.
7. DeWalle DR, Paulsell LK. 1969. Canapy interception, stemflow and streamflow on a small drainage in the Missouri Ozarks. Forestry Abstracts 13(2): 1854.
8. Ford ED, Deans JD. 1978. The effects of canopy structure on stemflow, throughfall and interception loss in a young Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 905-917.
9. Gash JHC, Morton AJ. 1978. An application of the Rutter model to the estimation of the interception loss from Thetford Forest. Journal of Hydrology 38: 49-58.
10. Gash JHC, Wright IR, Lloyd CR. 1980. Comparative estimates of interception loss from three coniferous forests in Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology 48: 89-105.
11. Gash JHC, LLoyd CR, Lachaud G. 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology 170: 79-86.
12. Gregoire TG. 1998. Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: appreciating the difference. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 28: 1429-1447.
13. Hamilton EL, Rowe PB. 1949. Rainfall interception by chaparral in California published by the State of California under terms of a cooperative agreement with the California Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Riverside, California.
14. Hanchi A, Rapp M. 1997. Stemflow determination in forest stands. Forest Ecology and Management 97: 231-235.
15. Herwitz SR, Levia DF. 1997. Mid-winter stemflow drainage from bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata Michx.) in central Massachusetts. Hydrological Processes 11: 169-175.
16. Johnson RC. 1990. The interception, throughfall, and stemflow in a forest in Highland Scotland and the comparison with other upland forest in the U.K. Journal of Hydrology 118: 281-287.
17. Lawson ER. 1967. Throughfall and stemflow in a pine-hardwood stand in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas. Water Resources Research 3(3): 731-735.
18. Lewis J, Mori SR, Keppeler ET, Ziemer RR. 2001. Impacts of logging on storm peak flows, flow volumes and suspended sediment loads in Caspar Creek, California. In Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas: Water Science and Application, Vol. 2, Wigmosta MS, Burges SJ (eds). American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 85-125.
19. Llorens P, Poch R, Latron J, Gallart F. 1997. Rainfall interception by a Pinus sylvestris forest patch overgrown in a Mediterranean mountainous abandoned area, I: monitoring design and results down to the event scale. Journal of Hydrology 199: 331-345.
20. Loustau D, Berbigier P, Granier A, El Hadj Moussa F. 1992. Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow in a maritime pine stand, I: variability of throughfall and stemflow beneath the pine canopy. Journal of Hydrology 138: 449-467.
21. Särndal C, Swensson B, Wretman J. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag: New York.
22. Spittlehouse DL. 1998. Rainfall interception in young and mature conifer forests in British Columbia. In Proceedings of 23rd Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Albuquerque: New Mexico; 171-174.
23. Viville D, Biron P, Granier A, Dambrine E, Probst A. 1993. Interception in a mountainous declining spruce stand in the Strengbach catchment (Vosges, France). Journal of Hydrology 144: 273-282.
24. Wright RL. 1983. Finite population sampling with multivariate auxiliary information. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(384): 879-884.
25. Ziemer RR. 1998. Flooding and stormflows. In Proceedings of the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, Ukiah, California, 6 May 1998. General Tech. Rep. PSW GTR-168; Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Albany, California; 15-24.